The part where it's defined-contribution instead of defined-benefit.
To be perfectly honest, I personally am better served with a 401(k): I'm in an above-average earning career (engineering), have lived well below my means, and am financially literate.
But most people are not like me. Frankly, the average worker in the US is either not competent or not disciplined enough to both actually contribute enough and invest it properly, and so as a nation we're careening towards a disaster of geriatric poverty the likes of which hasn't been seen since before Social Security was invented.
So yeah, the American working class was definitely scammed when pensions were replaced with 401(k)s. But hell, even if you don't understand the actual differences and implications, you could also tell it's fishy even just by the fact that the execs were so eager to switch over!
Y'know there's this thing called Target Retirement Date ETFs right? Also, aren't most 401ks either managed or extremely restricted towards very safe investment options?
Y’know there’s this thing called Target Retirement Date ETFs right?
Of course I do.
But a surprisingly large number of people either don't, or don't understand it and are terrified of making a mistake, so they end up making the much worse mistake of leaving their 401k contributions in the cash sweep account. (I think in recent years 401ks have started putting contributions in target-date funds by default instead of making people affirmatively choose it, but still, a lot of people lost a lot of years of growth to that issue alone.)
And again, that's not even talking about the people who simply don't [think they] make enough money to contribute at all, but would have had money going to their retirement if it had been in the form of a pension that they never had the option to decline and get in their paycheck instead. I have never heard of a 401k that forces you to put money away in order to ensure that your retirement is actually adequately funded, the way that pension plans used to handle automatically.
Perhaps but my years working for various companies that offered pensions with substantial vestment periods but which I didn't stay at for long enough to get are wasted, because pensions usually take 10+ years to earn, whereas if I'd had 401k contributions with vestment periods usually around 1.5-5 years I'd have a decent little bit of money from those that could have grown.
Now I have the best of both worlds where I get a defined contribution of 10% on top of whatever I earn added to my 401k with just a few years to vest.
Pensions only pay out if both company and employee are a type of loyal that is simply not common anymore.
Bruh, it's pretax dollars in an account that 9 times out of 10 out performs interest rates. Even in huge downturns, it will bounce back thanks to stock market goes brrrrrrrrr
If you're saying you're that 1 out of 10, then you made it sound like you lost money. Now you say your 401k is doing great? I'm sorry, I don't understand the point you're trying to make.
And yes, 09 was a shit show for 401ks/market value.
Ya you were scammed or we're not getting the full story. If it was a real 401k it's composed of diverse stocks and bonds and stuff and if it hit 0 the US wouldn't really exist. Unless you were self managing and put it all into a company that stopped existing or something.
You're math here isn't working out. Were you putting less than a dollar a paycheck? Did you have one employer the entire time.
Assuming you did not, when you changed job did you roll over the previous 401k into a Ira or spend it? Even if you ignored the paperwork, the money should still be out there somewhere.
There is a thin line between feeding trolls and calling out their bullshit in a civilized way because calling them out forcefully makes some people think I'm the bad guy.
My main concern here is making sure no one falls this idiots doomer advice because waiting to invest for retirement is a huge mistake.
And not everyone is raised by financially literate parents so they can't tell the difference between good and bad advice.
I am well aware of what my various accounts contain. You didn't answer any of my other questions.
Chance are you didn't roll over your 401k funds into an IRA and instead spent it.
Your post is so weak on details, I would advise no one to listen to you doomer advise.
More quesrions for you to ignore. Was their company matching? What percentage did you invest? Was it enough to trigger matching?
There are msnyneoole who have successfully retired with the 401k retirement scheme any bad results can be contributed to lack of financial literacy and responsibility.
Ya, this dude doesn't make any sense. He contributed every paycheck for 34 years but never looked at the account? Never once? Did he keep the same job for that long? How does he even know he was contributing if he never looked to see what it was doing? And he thinks he's uncovered some big conspiracy like no one else has used a 401k before? We're missing a huge part of the story.