There should be options other than renting and owning. If you don't wish to own property there should still be housing available to you, but it doesn't need to be rented from a landlord, it could be collectively owned (by tenants), municipal ownership, or something else. Relying on people with capital to provide housing while profiting from your need for housing is a broken system.
Do you really want government provided housing? The ones I am aware of are places like the projects and were the worst place to live (unless you were a drug dealer).
Someone putting a basement suite in their home isn't removing a purchasable dwelling from the market, it's adding to the number of available dwellings.
Oh that is funny. Normal renters dont take care of a unit let alone a person that is homeless. And many problems are out of the ability of almost everyone. Is the homeless person going to replace the HVAC system?
You're just also saying the "free market" does a poor job of providing for the needs of the people. A socialist government would build homes where they're needed
Sure. The problem I'm seeing here is how people approach the solution. You can tax the hell out of vacancies everywhere, but it's not going to help if there are no vacancies in specific cities.
"There's not a joblessness crisis, there's a labor shortage. We offered free pizza on fridays for this unpaid Senior Graphic Designer internship, and we're still not getting applicants"