Zed on Linux is out!
Zed on Linux is out!
Zed is a modern open-source code editor, built from the ground up in Rust with a GPU-accelerated renderer.
You're viewing a single thread.
Installer is piping curl into shell
I thought we were past this as a society 😔
ooh, available for “x86_65” on Alpine
(and they’ve fixed that now)
Have you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64.
Finally. 65 bit processor.
x86_64++
Plus ultra!
imagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set
I don't think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch.
Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit "bytes" (fyves?) Hoozah! Done.
only if double precision can be called high fyves
This is a mandatory rule now.
Now imagine designing a 65 bit computer. The bus, registers, alu...
You'll probably waste a lotta chips since most of them are designed for working with powers of 2
I mean its already in the nix repos as well as homebrew which means its essentially taken care of
I've been using it with the nix package manager. It's awesome how easy nix works
It appears to be a couple of versions behind ... and have some issues with dynamically linked libraries that hinder LSPs. Neither of these is Zed's fault. I'm sure the packaged version will be up to date momentarily (given the interest in Zed, sooner rather than later). Not sure how easy the LSP thing will be to fix, though there are some workarounds in the github issue.
yeah the editor is being updated way too fast for nix to keep up. I'm sure it'll be easier once it has its stable release. I see the have a nix flake in the repo, it would be great if they added a package to the outputs instead of just a devshell, nix users could easily build it from master or whichever tag they want.
There are solutions in this issue to the LSP issue. The editor would need to be built in an fhs-env, or they will need to find a way to make it uses binaries installed with nix instead of the ones it downloads itself. VSCode had a similar issue, so there is a version of the package that let's you install extensions through nix, and another that uses an fhs-env that allows extensions to work out of the box.
A curl piped into a shell or some unofficial packages from various distros.
At this point I don't get why these projects are not Flatpak-first.
Flatpak is worse for debugging, development, and reproducibility.
Its good for user friendly sandboxing, portability, and convenience.
Is it really worse tho? A single build, against a single runtime, free from distro specificities, packaged by the devs themselves instead of offloading the work on distro maintainers?
It is. Security problem in core library? Good luck waiting for 27 randos releasing an update. Whereas the distro updates it even before the issue becomes public.
I'll have to come up with some examples and write something more detailed I think to explore this.
Until NixOS I was very in favor of language specific package managers and things like flatpak.
Flatpaks are reproducible https://ranfdev.com/blog/flatpak-builds-are-not-reproducible/
You see the conclusion of that article is that flatpaks are not repeoducible after presenting solutions to make it reproducible right?
There are various package manager vectors for installation listed in the docs
That was my first thought as well, but I will say that uBlue distros had a signing issue preventing updates recently, due to an oversight with how they rotated their image signing keys, and the easiest (maybe only?) solution was to pipe a curl command to
sh. Even though uBlue is trustworthy, they still recommended inspecting the script, which was only a few lines of code.In this case, though, I dunno why they don't just package it as a flatpak or appimage or put it up oncargo.Edit: nvm, they have some package manager options.
It's made in rust, therefore it must be safe!
It is worrisome that all the smug elitists are too incompetent to just leave off the pipe and review from stdout, or redirect to a file for further analysis.
Same people will turn around and full throat the
aurscreaming 'btw' to anyone who dares look in their direction.By that logic you have to review the Zed source code as well. Either you trust Zed devs or you don't - decide! If you suspect their install script does something fishy, they could do it just as well as part of the editor. If you run their editor you execute their code, if you run the install script you execute their code - it's the same thing.
Aur is worse because there usually somebody else writes the PKGBUILD, and then you have to either decide whether to trust that person as well, or be confident enough for vetting their work yourself.