They must be pissed. All they can say is love Ukraine, hate Russia. Any other conversaion is banned from their community.

Someone give the news to the jerks at @Ukraine communities.

Is that what they call science now? Speculating about the total number of deaths in the next 84 years? Here are some facts:

"Some 363,500 people die annually from cold, while 43,700 die from excessive heat." Even if the dooming calculations came true, the deaths from cold will still be considerably higher, and the overall death count lower.

The rest is making things up.

Ai is hyped up autocorrection. All of tem are crap. Openai has been trying to go private, that is why they are making a fuss.

I didn't express that last part correctly. I meant that it was probably a single guy making those bots. A lot more effective that multiple funders, agencies, organizations and private companies working on "democracy" and "transparency".

As for the fault. The trouble started with a coup in 2014. Then internal conflict and then Russia entered differently with war. At every step of the conflict you have the US behind. The coup to put a US puppet, arming them, blowing up Russian infrastructure, and using other countries to block Russian gas in favor of more expensive American gas. Russia has made clear they don't tolerate NATO in Ukraine. It is as logical as Russia putting military bases in Canada or Mexico.

It took time to look that up. The link doesn't even have an about page. And an IP search shows it is a new site. From there the actual source site (German) you follow back the about pages back to the original sources. There is no need to for a bunch of links. Anyone can verify.

It's an information war like Hilary Clinton said.

The link goes to a site created less than two months ago kyivinsider. The source is from Alliance4europe.This is part of the DISARM Foundation, also know for AMITT (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques) framework.

That one belongs to the Credibility Coalition, and that one to Meedan. A San Francisco based organization funded by the US National Science Foundation and many organizations like Meta, Amazon, etc.

The Russians are amateurs at propaganda in comparison to the US.

Who put you in charge of what I can or cannot ask? Ignorance is believing that because it will reduce carbon it is automatically good. Lithium mining is also really bad for the environment. If Russia also had lithium reserves it will also be demonized as much as carbon.

Openai has been trying to switch for-profit. They must be loving the hype. Now they have an excuse.

I am merely asking a question. We know drilling holes deep in the ground, and then pumping water to get gas out is bad. But people assume drilling deep to get boiling water is good without question. It doesn't involve contaminated water, but what about the ecosystem?

I had heard about those pumps, but the article is talking about something else.

As for Russia and China. That's like saying that banning Huawei and TikTok is because the government care so much about privacy and has nothing to do with losing in business competition.

Gas and fossil fuel is also not about the environmental. American and Canadian companies *also do horrendous things to the environment. It's about stopping the competition from developing with cheap energy.

The heat source is geothermal boreholes.

From the article: "After reaching the reservoir with deep-drilling techniques developed for fracking, the companies intend to use the boiling water to power enormous heat pumps, delivering hot water to the surface and onwards to 20,000 homes in Vienna."

I know about that. However, the main reason for reducing emission is to reduce the influence of Russia and China, not the environment. But I mean that the technology is similar to fracking for gas (apparently bad), and fracking for hot water is good?

First time I hear about that. What environment effect could that have?