priorities, but you know how OnlyFans creators be posting to own the discourses https://archive.ph/337Kw #nowplaying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdGbXISimlk
are carl jung's theories the greatest cause to the misdiagnosis crisis?
moreover, do jungian concepts shape the understanding that grounds "a.i."?
since you know by 2020 that modeling categorical logic and categorical truth tables tell you less about the "trumper" than the non-trumper do you [really] want to risk it, framing the trumper, at least, as a "moron" who can't muster the "IQ" points (btw, was everybody jumping on that that new EQ+AQ+SQ wagon to own the Young-Girl's war on war)?
that paradoxical circumstance where trump acts the fool, because he knows you'll take the bait, in front of his base, amplified by algorithmic blunders: socialism and barbarism/annihilation, have always lived side-by-side. your mythology of technology only cyclically prevents you from seeing that.
he's no brian leiter.
one cat's nip is another cat's jazz
but it allows for some people to type out one-liners and generate massive blobs of text at the same time that they could be doing their jobs. /codecraft
- metacognitive myopia explained why people didn't/couldn't update their beliefs about the existence of "weapons of mass destruction etc".
- dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution "comrade kamala" (i.e., he's implying hypocrisy when he doesn't understand what lenin's use of the term "prostitute" meant).
- playing the fool until you can't (i.e., making his base feel insightful and "seen" as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
- from (3) somewhere in his administration they're letting the would-be "fool" base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see "Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information".
The president told yet another story Wednesday about how he experienced the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
(if you Select All and copy really fast behind an adblocker you can get all the text)
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn't, as what a settlement might imply.
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
have books become too heavy for men?
for the question "will artsy dot net have to start taking age verification?" to pass nimby codes
doctrine of double effect hours
since 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third "a.i." winter?
the gettier problem
mmo festive "sexual" cartesian theatres coming for disney world from japan with loving kindness
South Park's comedic antics will be lost on droves of beautiful souls unless The Critic is rebooted.
i'd like to think the motivations to think or practice prime our hinge commitments to attune to noopower such that we privatize our lives in spite of the commons. the available motivations, then, would be the actual problems, adoption and qualities of thinking, the symptoms.
bcs's On the Origin of Objects might make your day.
as someone who observes the interests of theology that has crossed disciplines with computer science, i should only speak from that regard, than as a web developer who puts a dog in the fight of competing styles, insofar as the styles bear ontological commitments. though, obviously the web is suffering in quality due to these dogmatic "software" "engineering" practices, it must be said. there's a wider tendency to advance metaphors which make certain paradigms more attractive to some developers than others based on philosophical prejudices coming from having accepted aristotle's agrilogistic axioms (law of noncontradiction, metaphysics of presence, essentialism). computer science is fundamentally ontotheological, not accidental, and engineers who follow martin are committed to a politicization of the object as more real than what objects are about. their style fails to purposefully and meaningfully ground fundamentally distributed applications, necessarily. someone might contrast martin against authors like brian cantwell smith, to see the orientation from which i speak.
greater still, we're seeing the outcome of what seems like decades of uncritical adoption of practices, what seems more like political movement than properly philosophical argumentation, everywhere in c.s. and wider applications of it.