Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FR
frazw @lemmy.world
Posts 2
Comments 175
'This chills me': Fascism experts horrified by Trump’s call for 'really violent day' of policing
  • Ok so can we start with a really rough day of policing election fraud, inciting insurrection, business fraud, not paying suppliers, sexual assault, stealing classified government documents, and shitting your pants in public. Then maybe the word will get out and we won't have to go further.

    ... Ok maybe not the last one. That's just unfair.

  • Dell sales teams are being instructed to return to the office five days a week, starting Monday.
  • "is intended to help build skills"

    Dell: "We've got to put a positive spin on this because everyone hates it and it doesn't actually benefit anyone, but our employees just can't be trusted. We know in our heart that working from home is damaging productivity, we just can't prove it. Sure we are beating our earnings predictions but that is with or lazy employees working from home. Just imagine what we could have made if we were able to crack the whip over them 8 hours a day."

  • They say “anyone can become president”, but this will be the first presidential election since 1970s, where there is no Bush, Clinton, or Biden on the ballot.
  • I know what the point was, but Biden is included as if he is part of some political dynasty. He was VP. A very normal situation, 19 out of 49 have run for president. It's like being promoted through the ranks until you get to the top. Isn't that kinda normal in most careers?

    So why is it "insanely improbable" for Biden, someone who qualified for the job over decades, to be "chosen" as opposed to anyone else.

    We aren't talking here about how much cash it requires to become president which raises the bar above most people's head.we are taking about political dynasties.

    So I say again, including Biden as if it is some statistical anomaly or stranglehold on politics is disingenuous, especially if you exclude Harris.

    Her situation of running for president after serving as vice president is EXACTLY the same as Biden unless you want to split hairs and say he served 2 terms and her only 1. So if you want to say Biden was given a silver spoon, so was she.

    Biden is not a dynasty. But if you insist he is, so is Harris, and that makes the original premise flawed.

  • They say “anyone can become president”, but this will be the first presidential election since 1970s, where there is no Bush, Clinton, or Biden on the ballot.
  • I don't think it's really fair to include "Biden" alongside "Bush" and "Clinton" and NOT include "Harris", just to make a point. The point is the Bush and Clinton represent two people each, a dynasty as it were. Biden is just one person. You might as well add then Harris since she has served as VP just like Biden, or Trump but I get the feeling this is intended to somehow make the statement that Harris represents a new breed of politics, a break from the old. That may or may not be true, but it doesn't hinge on this meaningless metric.

    "since 1981 there has never been an election without a Bush, Clinton, Biden, Trump or Harris."

  • Dems Name and Shame Companies Paying Executives More Than They Pay in Federal Taxes
  • The problem with conservatism though is that their voters will think this is a good thing. Taxes are bad full stop, so these companies are clever by lowering their tax bill. They don't see that the salaries are obscene. Then they complain about public services and infrastructure being bad.

  • Ford exec says most drivers don't realize the major perks of EVs like charging at home
  • He did say "most". But even if you live in an apartment you may not know it's possible to charge at a home, just not necessarily your home. So it's still valid even if apartment dwellers don't benefit. I think it is true that "most" people think you have to find a charger and then sit there for an hour everytime you need to charge when in fact you rarely need to do a full charge from 0, and if you have a home charger, rarely need to find a charger. Charging stations are only needed when you are travelling long distance and not many people are doing that routinely. If you are then buy an ICE or plan longer journeys.

    I think the biggest benefits though are much cheaper driving and instant, consistent power: no turbo lag, no gear changes, much quieter inside. I do occasionally have range anxiety, but then I've almost run out of fuel in an ICE before due to bad planning and closed service stations, so it is what you make of it.

    There isn't a good solution right now for apartments, but in Norway they had the idea to make street lights dual purpose with charging points inside. I think that could make life easier for everyone. They wouldn't be fast chargers, but it would replicate the home charger capability for those who can't have them. Infrastructure needs to catch up but I don't miss queuing for fuel.

  • Four dead and 18 hurt in Alabama mass shooting
  • Surely the day is approaching where enough Americans have been personally affected by gun violence that there are more that have than haven't. I often wondered if the reason it persists is because it is something that happens to other people so there is no feeling of urgency to put it at the center of politics. But it happens every fucking month??? ...wait, I just checked and I'm being too generous with "month". They happen almost every day. We only seem to hear about them once or twice a month outside America. You guys have them more regularly than sports games.

  • Anon falls in love
  • Reading lips is a visual representation of a sound. A teacher teaching you to read lips is only the relationship between two visual representations. Written word and moving lips. I think my point stands.

  • Qualcomm Approached Intel About a Takeover in Recent Days
  • I usually try to avoid partisan thinking, but I'm glad to see Intel faltering. AMD began to out perform Intel in the early 2000s AND were cheaper and Intel responded, not by improving their product, but by using their monopoly to sabotage performance on competitor CPUs via special compiler instructions. For some time this gave Intel the appearance of being the better choice for performance and AMD market share suffered. Luckily for all of us, AMD survived this preventing Intel from having an uncontested monopoly . Intel survives on a reputation they don't deserve it live up to.

    https://www.bateswhite.com/media/publication/124_AMD case study.pdf

  • People who destroy property over sportsball outcomes: Why?
  • You think the only reason people could find destructive, violent behaviour to be unusual or difficult to understand is because they have no passion in their own lives?

    I'm just a little sad that there are people in the world who have grown up in such violent, loveless homes that they can't conceive of finding violent behaviour over a sports game disgusting.

    I wonder how many of wives and partners who get the shit kicked out of them when their passionate "alpha" male's favourite team loses would agree with you. Oh it's OK, he had just lived such a full, passionate life that he sometimes loses his self control for a moment.

  • Amazon ends working from home for office staff
  • We've I've decided that we’re you are going to return to being in the office the way we you were before the onset of Covid", he said, adding that it would help staff be "better set up to invent, collaborate, and be connected enough to each other monitored because I don't trust them".

  • What characterises the musical style of the 2020s, 2010s and 2000s?

    Every decade has its musical style that generally makes it easy to place what decade a song was written in if you haven't heard it before.

    40s big band

    50s rock and roll

    60s essentially has its genre named after the decade or at least I can't think of anything I'd call a genre.

    70s punk and beginnings of heavy metal, disco

    80s electro synth, rap

    90s grunge, dance, R&B, trance

    Etc etc. Obviously these don't entirely define the music of the decade but are highly recognisable genres that can more often than not pinned down to a decade.

    So my question is, since the 2000s I don't see as much differentiation but that might be because I'm too old (44) and not as exposed to be music as I was in my teens, so help me pretend I'm "hip" and "with it" by giving me some clues. I'm curious to know what you think defines the music of the 2020s, what defines the 2010s and what defines the 2000s. I.e. When someone says they are going to listen to noughties music what do they put on? Etc. Or have we reached a point where music has been explored to the point new genres are much rarer to establish?

    17

    Supporters of Israel's actions in Gaza - why do you think the Geneva convention should not apply?

    The Geneva convention was established to minimise atrocities in conflicts. Israeli settlements in Gaza are illegal and violate the Geneva convention. Legality of Israeli settlements Article 51 of the Geneva convention prohibits indiscriminate attacks on civilian population yet Israel attacked hospitals with children inside. Whether you agree or not that Hamas were present, children cannot be viewed as combatants.so when no care was taken to protect them, does this not constitute a violation? According to save the children, 1 in 50 children in Gaza had been killed or injured. This is a very high proportion and does not show care being taken to prevent such casualties and therefore constitutes a violation.

    So my question is simply, do supporters of Israel no longer support our believe in the Geneva convention, did you never, or how do you reconcile Israeli breaches of the Geneva convention? For balance I should add "do you not believe such violations are occurring and if so how did you come to this position?"

    Answers other than only "they have the right to go after Hamas " please. The issue is how they are going after Hamas, not whether they should or not.

    EDIT: Title changed to remove ambiguity about supporting Israel vs supporting their actions

    97