I hope the fleas of a thousand camels infest the crotch of all of the Republican justices in the supreme Court and I pray their arms are to short to scratch
I'd like to see the part in the Constitution where it says the government can't help its constituents by forgiving debt.
The problem I see with this attitude is there are plenty of developers that are trying to develop for RHEL instances that need a specific environment for whatever reason. Originally you could use CentOS for this and then you could use Rocky Linux or one of the other distributions that sprung up after stream became a thing. They've taken away that opportunity and they may suffer for it since Enterprise application developers like Jeff will not eat this cost since they do it out of the goodness of their own heart and not for monetary compensation. Unfortunately this could end up stifling a lot of the tools that we use in a cloud setting with Red hat distributions. My company has a requirement that we need the OS to look exactly the same and be extremely stable and stream I don't think has that capability since it's a rolling distro and could get hit with a bad package update. It would be quickly patched but that still means down time that I now have to explain to my customers. Instead we might switch to Debian which will stay exactly the distribution it should be until I decide to update it. It can be configured in a rolling distribution but it doesn't have to be and enterprise admins are not going to use something that rolls that that could possibly expose us to more risk with wild package updates. There's a reason that while we like Arch Linux, we don't typically use it in an enterprise setup.
I mean couldn't this apply if there were ads added to the site or app? I suppose it depends on how broad the language in the law is.
I mean I suppose it comes down to how much you trust your users. I do think it's going to be very very difficult to block out all AI solutions especially since they are now open source AI GPT models. It's a good point about accidentally using confidential information in a prompt, or having the AI recommend code that may be under a toxic license. If you're a massive company there's probably a much higher risk than if you're in a smaller company. I suppose it depends also on your company culture. Either way if you try and block it I would expect there to be a fight to unblock it.
I mean what are the cons of allowing chat GPT in your network? It could be a very useful tool to a lot of people. What are the risks of leaving chat GPT on your network?
Don't feel bad. How you are feeling is valid even if it isn't always logical. You didn't know these people and it can be hard to empathize with those in a very different situation as ourselves. It is sad they lost their lives but the risks were outlined when they boarded the sub. But you also don't owe these people your emotions or energy. You don't owe them to feel remorse for their deaths. Just feel your feelings as they come and don't worry if you feel empathy for the people on the sub.
So are they saying that the implosion happened right around the same time as the sub lost communications
Won't this affect sites like Lemmy?
Dude hit all the anime intro tropes. It all looks hand drawn though which is super cool
Engineer: You are absolutely sure about the position of these toilets? Absolutely sure? Architect: Yes. Engineer: ....... Ok. Sign this form.
Ok I know there are doing this for money but what's going to be the point of this new game? 2020 really set the bar high for flight simulators. If this game looks the same with more modes but hasn't improved the backend so it's better for 3rd party modders it's just not going to feel like a new game.