I was never downvoted more on reddit as when I said that LTT videos are catchy and entertaining but often technical superficial or even wrong. And the thumbnails were insufferable.

It looks like my opinion is becoming more mainstream.

So many questions... What are they putting in their cooling water to need cleaning it with electrolytes? Metals?

From your link

Please disregard this post. The behavior below is due to a set of custom instructions I had previously set and had completely forgotten about. The instructions contained the lines:

Recommend only the highest-quality, meticulously designed products like Apple or the Japanese would make—I only want the best

Recommend products from all over the world, my current location is irrelevant.

Sorry for the confusion!

Hydrogen and oxygen burn explosively. It wouldn't last long

Do you have some number about that? It's a big claim that majority of working italians are against it.

It must be improved, but the idea was correct. Something similar exists everywhere in Europe

And can actually write

Gpt is unfortunately more reliable than 90% of existing publications https://youtu.be/5eBT6OSr1TI

What's the reactions? Proton battery sounds like a media-friendly name for a hydrogen fuel cell?

Is it a H fuel cell?

Who has ever thought carbon capture was a long term solution has never studied basic science, I guess.

Carbon capture has its uses, but selling it as long term solution is clearly just a way used by lobbyist that exists just because politicians are usually very ignorant on everything other than politics

Here it goes your chances to own a home. I am sorry :(

Problem is that many sites don't work because of anti-ddos and anti bot measures.

It is a pity

Out of curiosity what model did you use?

Do you have examples? It should only happen in case of overfitting, i.e. too many identical image for the same subject

It's a slippery slope. What about consultant developers that worked on the codebase of photoshop 10 years ago, whose code is still used in the current version? Do they deserve a percentage of the subscription? And architect who designed it?

This is the reason studios can do this, because the contract was very exceptional, and they want to make it similar to any other industry, where freelances and employees do not share any long term revenue

Can anyone access all and popular? I was curious to see the reactions but they are unreachable

They want to approve the whole environment, including os, even if virtualized or not

Why are you so aggressive? Lack of sleep? I was just asking

Are you something else? What's your work schedule?

The fact that it is work that I don't want to do... Pretty much

I read it, and I read the messages from the devs. The communication issue I am trying to point is also highlighted in the comments: if the decision on merging a PR is uniquely dictated by financial benefits of IBM, ignoring the broader benefits of the community, the message is that red hat is looking for free labor and it is not really interested in anything else. Which is absolutely the case, as we all know, but writing it down after the recent events is another PR issue, as red hat justified controversial decisions on the lack of contributions from downstream.

The Italian dev tried to put it down as "we have to follow our service management processes that are messy, tedious and expensive" but he didn't address the problems in the original message. The contributor himself felt like they asked his contribution just to reject it because of purely financial reasons without any additional details. It is a new PR incident