I love this.

Maybe they don't realize, but I don't think they would care either way.

Not only was the piloting bad, so was the camera work. Holy fuck, keep the thing in the centre of the shot.

If I find one, I will.

So my assessment of the article based entirely on the headline was accurate? That assessment being that the article is a whole lot of nothing.

Not exactly a high bar.

Where the fuck did I put my glasses? Lemme just put on these glasses to look for them.

Oh, right.

This is not about Americans, it's about the dumbest Canadians.

I'm not mad I just don't trust the Devs of Star Citizen. I think their monetization as a whole reeks of a scam and I don't understand why people defend it.

Oh it's not one tech demo, it's several. They aren't connected. If they aren't connected it isn't a game. People just don't want to admit they were scammed when they "bought" that fancy ship in that "game".

I got one for free because the people didn't want to haul it out of their basement.

I didn't even know that game existed until I saw headlines saying it failed. It wasn't marketed well and I would bet that was on purpose. I think they knew it was terrible, why else wouldn't they try to sell it?

It's easy to ignore actually. Where game? I don't care how pretty your tech demo is. Where game?

Omg, so reactionary.

Yes, that's the whole point. Note that the name is "The Outbursts of Everett True" not "The calm discourse of Everett True"

Real "by law, it's illegal to be a criminal." Vibes from that headline.

This is as wholesome as it is sad.

It's a feminine penis.

Text doesn't convey tone, and not everyone who reads what you write knows you personally. The /s doesn't ruin the joke near as much as the person who thinks you are being serious does when they raise a shit-fit over it.

How does linking a wikipedia page help them find a place to acquire pemmican?