Atletico who are like top 5 in form during that period doesn't make top 30? Did they just forget about them or something

But if the end result is correct, what is there really to whine about?

You think it would be more fair if he allowed an offside goal?

Wait they could qualify directly without a playoff through Nations League?

But it was offside, so who cares how the ref reached that decision? The end decision is 100% correct so it doesn't really matter how they arrived at the decision

Maybe the process of reaching the decision was wrong, but the end decision is still correct. So how can you be bothered to complain over not being given a false goal?

If he had disallowed the goal because VAR forgot to check for offside it still would have been an incorrect goal

The keeper made zero effort to get the ball. He wasn’t being hindered at all.

This is a hilariously bad take. He was standing right on top of the keeper and blocking him. Unless Hendry is a ghost how was Simon supposed to go through him?

That is a clear as day interference and only someone with insane bias could deny it

Standing right on top of the goalkeeper whilst in an offside position is clear interference lmao

They are straight up lying lol, I get feelings are running high but imagine making shit up just to force a false narrative

He is standing on top of Simon and has his hand on his chest. There is absolutely no way Simon could have got around him to get the cross

No matter how the decision making process transpired it was the correct decision in the end

No I can't, it was really weird that the first replays first seemed to indicate it as a foul. I was as baffled as you

But on the later replays it is a no brainer, clear as day offside. The end decision was correct so what is there to cry about?

No I can't, it was really weird that the first replays first seemed to indicate it as a foul. I was as baffled as you

But on the later replays it is a no brainer, clear as day offside. The end decision was correct so what is there to cry about?

No I can't, it was really weird that the first replays first seemed to indicate it as a foul. I was as baffled as you

But on the later replays it is a no brainer, clear as day offside. The end decision was correct so what is there to cry about?

First of all, it's hilarious to see r/soccer once again getting their knickers in a twist over a perfectly correct refereeing decision. The Scotland player was offside and clearly interfering with Unai Simon. That's why the goal was disallowed not for a foul..

Anyways, Spain were clearly the better side and if Ferran scores his early sitter than it probably would have ended 4-0 or something. Scotland showed great fighting spirit and threw their bodies on the line but no one can deny that they were outplayed for most of the match

Spain has now won 25 home matches in a row in Euro qualifiers. More than any other side in history

It was disallowed for offside not for a foul! 100% correct decision and anyone with two eyes will agree

It's unbelievable how this forum can just make up narratives and run with them lol

It was disallowed for offside not for a foul! 100% correct decision and anyone with two eyes will agree

It's unbelievable how this forum can just make up narratives and run with them lol

Doubt it, Norway are extremely weak mentally in decisive matches

I could see Norway get back into it only to shit their pants against Scotland away last match

It was given for offside btw, not a foul

It was given for offside btw, not a foul

The guy was offside, that is why it was disallowed not for a foul

R/soccer are masters of getting outraged about correctly disallowed goals lmao

Waaaay too good for that joke of a "project"