No but if you tug your meat with your left more than your right by the time you die, believe it or not, straight to hell
I played botw. Never would have on a switch. That thing is technologically pathetic. From what I hear it hardly makes 20fps? In what world is that playble. I used to play a fps called combat arms back in around 2006 on an x1600. Both my frame rate and the textures were better than botw. Every tower you climb you just look out at all 4 polygons and wonder if the game is even complete.
If totk was on the same technical level as botw, it's no wonder people emulate their legit copies. They want to play the game they paid for in 2024 with shadows and textures at a playable frame rate. Nintendo won't give that to them but modders usually have texture packs ready to go on new releases that reveals how much their shitty handheld holds their games back.
How cool the building and freedom is means shit if it's a miserable chore to play. You can't even turn the camera sensitivity up high enough to utilize a lot of the building freedom without a camera fix making some cool mechanics or build utility you see people performing in clips literally impossible on the native switch.
Drg survivor has been done right too as was drg. GSG is a great developer.
I think you're misunderstanding things. You trust these companies to do what is best for the consumer. That's not how the rest of us, or the companies you're defending, consider things. Their interest is in the bottom dollar. If screwing you makes a buck, they'll do it. Trusting them to do the right thing is a major player in enshittification.
I agree. Keep the spruce moose south of the border
How you misunderstood that is exactly how they take advantage of this kind of packaging. Great example
Looks like astroturfing to me
Yea I'll install something and try to search for it a week later just to open it faster and Bing is like "oh here's some tasty breakfast places near you" then provide restaurants near North Korea.