Our powers combined, we can make it one.

If that's true then a simple VPN and some social media opsec will work.

The government cannot access the information without a warrant. It does not matter if SPYco lays it all out on a public website. If they needed a warrant to track you before, they need a warrant to check for you on the public website.

Saying the government is allowed to obliterate the 4th amendment because a private company did the hard part is just asking for government aligned corporations to gather it all up and hand it over whenever the government gives them a dollar.

That required special assembly. It was not a hack blowing up commercial batteries. That's not a possible thing. They gave Hezbollah pagers and radios with explosives built in.

Yes. When your phone is off, it is off.

If you're paranoid you can buy a faraday bag.

We already have rights protecting us from this. They aren't being enforced.

Places that specify on call time also tell you not to check stuff when you're not at work or supposed to be on call though, because that's expensive for them. And if they tell you to check something they just put you into on call pay.

There are places that pay well for on call though.

That's what gets struck in a white strike.

You haven't proven a damn thing.

Yes but that rule protects you the same as it does them. They can be a monopoly if nobody else can get their chips sold but they cannot be a government enforced monopoly unless nobody else is allowed to sell chips.

But they can sell phones.

That's not a government enforced monopoly. A government enforced monopoly means nobody else is allowed in the market. Like utility companies.

What's government enforced about it? Is ARM the only allowed chip designer for cellphones?

You have to be extraordinarily unlucky to be hit by a wild shot at range. Unless there's someone right behind the drone it's not going to matter.

You're still wrong.

I think we have different standards for the start of an ideology. I'm looking for it's broad use as a self identification. I freely admit it has it's roots in the 1800's, and I admitted above the word was in some use all the way back through the 1400's with similar meaning. Although it was mostly used against the church until the 1700s. It certainly isn't just one among many. That was the problem the writers were trying to solve in the early 1900's when they started identifying as Libertarian Communist/Socialist. They were unifying anarchism, council communism, workerism, and a few others. So the idea wasn't to be one among many but to bring those ideas into a tent. That's what was different about the 1890's and the 1910's. It went from a word getting thrown around to a specific ideological label.

I didn't really mean you when I talked about people claiming moral superiority. I was just venting that people are trying to claim it was a coherent ideology contemporary to the very beginning of communism by twisting things around. I also don't care that you took a day to respond, that just means you put real thought into a conversation that should have some real thought.

Well can't outrun it and you can't take the ammo with you after you die.

Who actually extended the timeline to get more stuff and people out.

While that's true, this helicopter was in ANA colors. It's one of the ones we'd already given the Afghan Army.