From what that article says, this fee is only charged to a PayPal balance. I have no clue who's keeping a balance in a PayPal account, but it's not like they're going to charge someone's payment methods.

Not defending them, I just find it surprising that they have any customers this could even apply to.

Not sure why people are beating up on @[email protected] for saying his opinion. Different people value different things.

I think I can answer your question though. Buying a console is a plug and play experience. Building a PC is not. Not everyone has the time, the patience, or the technical experience required to purchase compatible components, assemble the machine, and install the various software.

Anyone that's ever bought a prepared meal has overpaid in comparison to acquiring the ingredients, prepping them, and cooking the dish. It's worth the price to do so because I sure as hell don't want to spend time making a bowl of French onion soup.

If only people would remember there's two other steps before recycling. Not really helpful to corporate marketing strategies though now is it.

Perhaps that is one of the intended purposes - to trick people into thinking its a new video, so more ads are delivered by such mistakes.

Some more analytically inclined creators have been aware of this musical thumbnail game long before YouTube implemented what I described. They would just do it manually before, or perhaps even had custom software to do it for them.

I'm not aware of any option that allows creators to enter multiple titles in the same fashion as the thumbnail mechanism, though it wouldn't surprise me. There have long been videos that dynamically change their titles based on video analytics. Perhaps most famously exemplified by Tom Scott.

Unfortunately, when these types of titles draw views, this trend won't be slowing down any time soon.

I'd encourage people to look into the DeArrow extension, which replaces both clickbait titles (like how OP did on this post) and the thumbnail to remove the eye catching nature of the originals.

One of the many mechanisms within the YouTube algorithm these days is a feature that allows creators to upload multiple thumbnails, and the system switches between them to see which one works better for which audience. From what I've heard, this thumbnail feature even leads to years old videos being 'revived' and pulling in additional ad revenue for the creator.

That's great for the creators, but it does have this side effect where the - let's say quality - of thumbnails and titles is sliding in a less that ideal direction. Though this could be said of the platform, or even the internet, in general.

Funny, I went through the article twice looking for the term length. Maybe I missed it because it's written and I was looking for a digit. Thanks for pointing that out.

This article doesn't specify, but based on the previous 25% offer, I'm guessing this new and improved proposal is also structured over four years.

New information to me is that the union initially sought a 40% increase. Kind of silly to think that when 90% of your workers decline an offer - any offer - that adding an extra few percent will get you an agreement.

I wrote this before when the union declined the 25% bump, but it bears repeating:

If Boeing were to pay the 40% the union is looking for upon returning to work, and committed to annual salary increases that were double whatever inflation is moving forward, they would have 32,000 employees that would never strike the rest of their careers.

It's not a surprise to anyone in fuckcars, but to wider audiences it could just be a matter of them never considering it. Our parents had cars, now we have cars, cars are used to go places, even if I get stuck in traffic it's worthwhile to get to my destination - end of thought.

Sure there's a huge group of 'carbrains' but in my experience, most people don't have an allegiance one way or the other.

In theory, Sponsorblock could evolve to download a new video multiple times, check what frames match each copy, and use that data to skip to the next matching frame when users watch something.

This would overcome video stream ad injection even if every ad was a different length and in a different location each time someone watched the video.

Well yes, as in step one in a many step process. Most places don't even consider step one.

Honestly, there aren't many places that do bike lanes well anyway, and so long as the idea of bike lanes in Ontario is a painted line at the edge of the asphalt, I wouldn't bother.

Thanks for pointing that out. I'd missed the last line on my first read of it somehow.

Additionally, 1/3 of the revenue from any subscriber is allocated to the creator responsible for bringing in that subscriber.

This reads to me like this is the purpose of going to a creator specific link when initially signing up. For example, if you go to nebula.tv and sign up from their main page, no specific creator gets that 33% cut of your revenue. Alternatively, if you see a YouTube video where a creator talks about their content also being on Nebula, they ask you not to go to the platforms main page, but specifically to nebula.tv/zagorath to sign up. If I went to that link and signed up, you would get 33% of my subscription revenue.

To me, this opens another question of what is this the term of this 33% cut. I doubt it's a cut of the revenue for so long as my subscription is active. I'd imagine it's more likely a cut of whatever the initial payment is, be it a single month's subscription fee or a full year.

You just reminded me I've got to mail my modem back. Thanks!

Am I the only one annoyed at the graph being backwards? The past goes on the left, the present on the right.

I wear a set of these every day, for hours at a time. I started writing what I thought would be a concise comment that turned out to be not concise. I tried to break it up because no one likes a wall of text.

To sum up, I'll be buying another pair when my current ones kick the bucket, and another after that.

Problem -

Reaction -

Solution

Evil was a stretch, sure. Though while I appreciate the concept of not attributing malice to what incompetence explains, I think that needs to be couched by whether or not a profit is being turned by the action.

Someone? I'm talking about having a corporation admit it's own wrongdoing, not a specific individual.

You just know someone in the chain wanted to be able to say, 'we were the first', then they got fact checked and had to add in that qualifier of commercially available ground station.