Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CH
Chronokill @lemmy.world
Posts 2
Comments 5
[MEGATHREAD] What did you buy in the Steam Summer Sale?
  • I thought it had the best "craft potion from various ingredients" minigames I've seen in an alchemy game in a long time. That's basically all it tries to be, it knows it, and it works. My biggest gripe is that the UI is borderline unplayable on console. My wife would LOVE this, but she's a console gamer from the couch 20 ft away, and it just wouldn't work.

  • Obsidian responds to 'concerns' about Avowed's Xbox and PC visuals and scope
  • The linked thread has a bit more nuance. There was some concern the graphical fidelity (textures, character models) was fairly lacking. Looking at this specific screen grabs, I can see the complaints. But at this point in production (and given that these are probably edited marketing videos), I'm assuming this type of stuff can still be improved before launch.

  • www.windowscentral.com Obsidian responds to 'concerns' about Avowed's Xbox and PC visuals and scope

    Comments from a developer shed light on Microsoft and Obsidian's upcoming RPG epic.

    3
    What's with the schism between lemmygrad and beehaw?
  • I'm a total noob when it comes to this federation stuff, but what does this mean for me, an account-holder of a 3rd party instance (lemmy.world) but likes to subscribe to a lot of the beehaw communities. Will they no longer show up to me? Do I have to jump through additional hoops (I'm really trying to not have to juggle multiple accounts across instances) if I want all my info in one place?

  • Will the Judge in Trump’s Case Recuse Herself—or Be Forced To? - Federal law requires a judge to step away from a case in which her impartiality “might reasonably be questioned.”
  • Thanks for this, good read. It seems to be a clash of comprehension between a layperson (what does a reasonable question of impartiality look like) and the judiciary (We're emotionless machines who are capable of cordoning off sections of our brain, how dare you intimate we can be biased). Seems its the judiciary making the call on this one.