David Grusch testifies under oath to congressional sub-comittee
Historic moment as David Grusch, Ryan Graves and David Fravor testify under oath to congressional sub-committee on UAPs. Includes UAP crash retrieval programmes, NHI ,and cover ups.
In a bombshell letter, Canadian politician Larry Maguire has urged Canada's Minister of National Defence to request a briefing which could verify that Canada and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance are involved in a secretive program concerning the recovery and exploitation of materials originating
George Knapp and John Lear 1987 interview
Parts:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LGQkkHuwm6w&pp=ygUWZ2VvcmdlIGtuYXBwIGpvaG4gbGVhcg%3D%3D
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ItRiw2HwvF0&pp=ygUWZ2VvcmdlIGtuYXBwIGpvaG4gbGVhcg%3D%3D
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c0jurqZ4WMI&pp=ygUWZ2VvcmdlIGtuYXBwIGpvaG4gbGVhcg%3D%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsl8zTFA_I8
Almost need to rewatch these historical interviews with a new light after David Grusch coming forward.
Yeah agree the Raytheon guy was definitely the weakest testimony there. Maybe he didn't have enough time to explain but a lot of his technical explainations were so vague and felt a bit like word salad. Hopefully we'll find out in time!
Ha ha true! But the more sources confirm and we don't believe them then the more we have to think that everyone is a liar. With each separate source that becomes less likely.
Irrespective of Greer take the witnesses on their own. Also see if the message that is said is relevant. The message about what we could do with the technologies is true no matter who says it. It can be used to bring about a new bright future or our own extinction through tribalism and warfare. UAP technologies are a greater danger to humanity than nuclear weapons if used in the wrong way.
What I find interesting is that this datapoint is one that bolsters and reaffirms the strength of many of the existing datapoints/leaks that have come before. Thereby lifting the entire UAP topic.
I think that is what the whole point of the Disclosure Project. If we accept that the UAP behave in the way that we are observing then the physics for it must exist. We can also not presume to know how that physics should behave as it is an unknown. A physicist might only be told part of the story and even then would not have a basis for any theory or believed as the physics is so far beyond us.
Having a technology and using it is different from understanding it and replicating. I imagine if you went back in time 200 years and told people about computers and tried to recreate it, it would be impossible.
This would change the world as we know it if we have it figured out but the technology could be used to either bring about a utopia or our extinction.
Video showing something apparently behind the fence as well : Behind the fence
ALIEN BODIES! Video evidence of U.S. held UFO handed over to journalists | Redacted w Clayton Morris
Former Marine Michael Herrera tells DailyMail.com that he saw a UFO being loaded with weapons in Indonesia in 2009.
Yeah definitely the David Grusch story is the main one to follow and will have a real lasting impact over the long term.
The Vegas story is still interesting though and hopefully we will all have enough attention span to follow both.
Brightened image version of what could possibly be the aliens head hiding behind the forklift. From reddit user CKC-III : Brightened image of alien hiding
Brightened image version of what could possibly be the aliens head hiding behind the forklift. From reddit user CKC-III : Brightened image of alien hiding