Starfield’s player count slips below Skyrim on Steam, just two months after Bethesda’s ‘biggest launch ever’
Starfield’s player count slips below Skyrim on Steam, just two months after Bethesda’s ‘biggest launch ever’
Starfield is back on top by a few hundred players, but for how long?
Here's the thing though: Skyrim is an anomaly. Dev companies don't care if you're still playing their games after you buy them. It was Bethesda's biggest launch ever, and that's all they care about because just having players play the game doesn't make them money.
It's a sad pattern, but eventually all aging game dev studios take this path. They need a big launch. They don't need continued patronage from their players.
Also, I've only ever heard that starfield is a buggy mess with ironically limited gameplay options for the scope of the universe it's in, and the philosophy the studio took of "yeah not everything is supposed to be interesting, there's plenty of empty space" seems a lot like shooting themselves in the foot.
I agree that lots of game companies do only have to care about the launch, but I disagree that this applies for Bethesda, because:
- many (even casual) folks were still buying copies of Skyrim two months after its launch, as it turned out to be so popular.
- experienced players do hold off on buying Bethesda games on launch day, because they are known to be buggy.
- they were able to milk Skyrim for many years, offering DLC and releasing it on all kinds of platforms.
they were able to milk Skyrim for many years, offering DLC and releasing it on all kinds of platforms.
Aye, the SE and Anniversary editions made them non-trivial money. Can't understate how that helped float them through the disaster that was Fallout76
I like Starfield, but there being no way to play it aside from being a member of constelation is an RP killer, plus the lack of a survival mode