There's a big difference between "9/11 was a conspiracy" and "9/11 was fake."
I think lots of folks agree that we didn't get the entire story behind what happened that day.
I think no one who was alive that day believes it was "fake."
The one thing that still makes me wonder about the whole thing is what the government was able to accomplish as a 'solution' to 9/11. From what I know about mk ultra, the crack epidemic, tuskegee, etc is that the government has no problems killing their own civilians to accomplish their goals.
Not saying that's what happened, but I just don't trust the feds, or state governments
Only thing that ever stood out so much for me was the WTC building 4 collapse. Idk I was pretty dumb and into YouTube conspiracies back then so maybe it was BS.
Fire in a skyscraper is a huge issue.
Debris from tower 2 started a fire in tower 7.
And as anyone who works with steel can tell you, you don't need to get it that hot before it bends like a limp noodle. A blacksmith can forge with a wood fire as long as it's built up enough and has good air flow.
Broken windows and flaming debris made for the perfect setup for an uncontrollable fire.
Yeah it is certainly something...
Wake up, Sheeple! Bush Jr. was in the Air National Guard! A trained pilot! HE was the one flying the plane! smh, everyone falls for the "Terrorists doing things that they literally admit to doing for reasons that make sense within the context of their worldview and past actions" schtick when the obvious answer is right in front of them!
Heat weakened structural steel cannot withstand a tight 330' turn down thousands of feet!
Wake up people!
They are specifically discussing the Pentagon attack, not the entirety of the incidents that occurred on 9/11.
They also never state it was fake, rather that the story provided doesn't make a lot of sense so it seems like there is more to it.
