The government doesn't use SQL
The government doesn't use SQL
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9912e57e-8dab-466e-9d3e-f6af624b28b6.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9912e57e-8dab-466e-9d3e-f6af624b28b6.jpeg?format=webp)
See the post on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/provisionalidea.bsky.social/post/3lhujtm2qkc2i
According to many comments, the US government DOES use SQL, and Musk is not understanding much what's going on.
You're viewing a single thread.
As someone who has literally helped the government use SQL for over a decade, this is huge news.
152 1 ReplyElon and DOGE should really look into all of those Oracle contracts the Fed pays for. Must be all inefficiency and fraud.
57 0 ReplyPlease do. Most of my sales these days are people dropping Oracle due to cost.
35 0 ReplyIt would be one of the areas that would save the government a bunch of money. But, Ellison is in the Trump camp so it’s not going to happen.
16 0 ReplySpinnaker? MongoDB? EnterpriseDB?
3 0 ReplyIf Oracle works for the application and you want to save money, you’ll stick to SQL. Probably Postgres, MySQL, or MariaDB.
1 0 ReplyAll of those are open source, so nothing to sell really (well, except MySQL, which is Oracle).
EnterpriseDB is the closest you can get to "selling" Postgres.
1 0 ReplyI’m sure EDB isn’t the only one in town selling support contracts for open source applications. It is a lucrative business.
1 0 ReplyNot the only one, but the closest one.
1 0 Reply
At least they aren't using Access????
5 0 ReplyAccess can do (some) SQL! 😱
I’ve worked for US federal government, access to Access* was the only way I could do some things that wasn’t torture… severe torture.
*keep in mind that SQL is a query language. It can be implemented in different ways and not necessarily within an RDMS.
10 0 Reply