Perekle! The DARVO tactic actally worked on me. Denies the accusation by ommission. Attacks the hermits for not giving him enough time. Reverses the victim and offender bringing out his depression and defamation.
This rings extremely hollow to me. He provided no evidence that he was only given an hour and was not going to be able to ask for an extension. A person has publicly outed him, and he is not willing to share evidence to defend his side of the story because of respecting their privacy... That does not make a lot of sense when his entire livelihood has been compromised. Other than "Trust me bro, I was treated unfairly and I have no evidence but believe me, I was cancelled with a targeted attack and I did nothing wrong" this video contributes nothing of substance to the discussion.
If he is telling the truth (I have no reason to disbelieve at this point) then he actually can't talk about it due to lawyers and police being involved.
That video was the bare minimum you could do under those circumstances.
I mean, I think there's a lot of reason to disbelieve him. There were multiple accusers that released the documentation and proof. He said that one accuser was not credible and provided no proof. He also said that that accuser had attacked someone else and didn't provide any proof. At this point there's lots of reasons to believe the accusers and not really any reason to believe him.
To be honest hearing what Iskall has to say raises some questions on how the hermits approached this issue.
There's a lot of unknowns right now but giving someone and hour and a half to defend themselves feels a tad unfair
