Most of the 100 million people who signed up for Threads stopped using it
Most of the 100 million people who signed up for Threads stopped using it
"We're seeing more people coming back daily than I'd expected," Zuckerberg said.
Most of the 100 million people who signed up for Threads stopped using it::"We're seeing more people coming back daily than I'd expected," Zuckerberg said.
So we're gonna sit here and pretend that there weren't automatic sign-ups for Instagram users? They got signed up without choice. Facebook did that.
Edit: I was wrong! I remember reading about this early on, but I think I read misinformation. Sorry about that.
It wasn't automatic. Not sure where you got that idea. But you had to get the app and then sign in using your Instagram account to set up the thread profile. They had "shadow copies" of your Instagram profiles on threads so for example you could sub to someone's profile and when they'd join threads you'd get their activities. But no it wasn't automatic.
Relevant username
Upvoted for your edit. Publicly admitting you're wrong has become too rare.
I have no problems publicly admitting that you are wrong.
I think because people's egos are more fragile than ever these days. Being wrong is like end of the world.
This is the key. There certainly were NOT 100mm people that signed up of their own accord.
There's no such thing as 100mm people. That's just 10cm, even infants are taller than that.
To add further context to the corrections this comment has already received, there are 1.6 billion (with a B) Instagram users. Far more than 100 million.
It was super easy to sign up but ultimately it’s missing a lot of features and is why people didn’t stick around. There’s still no search or hashtags so finding content that interests you is basically luck with the algorithm.
While it wasn’t entirely automatic they’ve showed ads for it in Instagram that easily fooled you into assuming, that the only way you can continue using Instagram was by creating a Threads Account.
It’s severe lack of features was its downfall. I signed up and my feed was full of random celebs with no way to filter it to people you follow (apparently they added this recently). But the main issue NO FCKING SEARCH, you can only search for accounts nothing else. Discoverability if you are not a famous person is basically 0. No hashtags so no discussion of specific trends or topics. No Trends in general.
This was my biggest driver as well, I liked the platform but it lacked features and I too hate being flooded with people I don’t know on my feed.
They are going to continue to bleed users because of lack of features.
They're going to add features. It's typical for software development nowadays.
You get out on the market early just to be there (or to exploit a favorable moment like feeding on Twitter's carcass), then add features later.
It works, too. People will grumble but at least they have something to grumble about right now. It beats a perfect service at an unspecified date later.
That's okay, it's still sending all your data to Meta, and that's the important thing.
FOMO was the big driver here. Once they saw Threads sucked, the peaced out.
i know a whole bunch of people who signed up just because, looked around, and the never used it again.
Can't expect people who are actually still using twitter to stop at this point.
Launching a new social media network and not making it available in the EU is really dumb imho.
Not launching in the EU tells you everything you need to know about their privacy policies.
Nearly half still using it is actually pretty good. Stupid headline.
No shit, it's S-tier shit and they were signed up without asking to be.
Most? The article says "more than half" so which is it?
I think those two phrases mean the same thing
Which one do you prefer?