I do not really understand all the fuss and fear about Threads.
Either the content is good, then we should be happy and federate.
Or it's bullshit/insults/racist/etc. crap - then we just block it.
Federation with threads could help threads to become the "default" home instance for most users. Then meta could pull the plug at any moment as most new communities would also run on threads. Threads could be the good old "Embrace, extend, and extinguish".
In reality, Meta is not federating to pull the few people off the Fediverse.
We are far too few to be of any relevance. Threads got twice the amount of users within a day. Soon they will dwarf the whole Fediverse even more.
The only reason why they announced to (and will) federate is to avoid anti trust problems.
And that also means: If they pull the plug and defederate, they will immediately end up on investigation.
All opinions are valid, and we can all choose instances that align with our views, but for my part I won't support an instance that federated with meta just on principle.
A short TLDR I guess: Milan (the instance admin) wants to wait and see how the situation evolves and not block them in advance. Though if they moderate like Facebook does it might happen anyway.
Hope this clears up everything for you! Have a nice day or evening.
The question was posed and therefore answered in German. I do not think any excluding was intended, and translation help like deepl usually is only an URL and a bit of copy/paste away.
Milan himself tries to keep Meta out of his life, but he does not think panicking without solid data is the way to go. He wants to keep an eye on how the situation evolves, and if Meta is practicing non-moderation like on facebook, he will not federate with them for that even before entertaining deeper ethical questions.