[Discussion] Why voting should not be used here at all
Everyone I have something very important to say about The Agora.
The Problem
Let me be super clear here to something people don't seem to understand about lemmy and the fediverse. Votes mean absolutely nothing. No less than nothing.
In the fediverse, anyone can open a instance, create as many users as they want and one person can easily vote 10,000 times. I'm serious. This is not hard to do.
Voting at best is a guide to what is entertaining.
As soon as you allow a incentive the vast majority of votes will be fake. They might already be mostly fake.
If you try to make any decision using votes as a guide someone WILL manipulate votes to control YOU.
one solution (think of others too!)
A counsel of trusted users.
The admin, top mods may set up a group to decide on who to ban and what instances to defederate from. You will not get it right 100% of the time but you also won't be controlled by one guy in his basement, running 4 instances and 1,000 alts.
This is a valid concern. Our procedure for voting requires that a user comment Aye/Nay. Therefore, anyone is free to view the user profile to assess whether they might be a bot.
We will continue to assess whether we can better protect the decision making process from bots, but due to the small size of this forum, it would seem fairly tricky to influence the vote just yet.
Rest assured that we won't be fooled by one guy in his basement running 1,000 alts.
In the fediverse, anyone can open a instance, create as many users as they want and one person can easily vote 10,000 times. I’m serious. This is not hard to do.
No. We will not be accepting 10,000 votes from Lulzsec.troll in our Agora threads. This is an easy problem to solve.
Then you will need to check every single votes profile. Ensure they have a valid history, with active comments and post. And then you will still likely be dealing with power users who maintain a dozen or more alts.
Bots can mimic this type of thing very easily BTW. You can write scripts to just repost top reddit post, hacker news post.
There are so many ways to game the system I just don't understand what you actually expect to accomplish with votes.
I will check every profile. If people have dozens of alts with active, legitimate comment histories within a month of the platform forming, then I commend them for their activity.
We are following a democratic process here. We aren't delegating the decision making to an oligarchy, even if it would simplify things.
There is no example of the system being manipulated thus far. Wait until you have evidence of that occurring before fearmongering like this.
I will check every profile. If people have dozens of alts with active, legitimate comment histories within a month of the platform forming, then I commend them for their activity.
When you run a script which randomly generates bot accounts on other various servers- you aren't going to notice anything tied back to a particular profile.
In the case of the proof I linked, the bot names were very generic, and extremely easy to spot. However, its VERY easy to have the bot generate real usernames.
Its also, extremely easy to have the workflow generate actual comments, related to random posts and conversations too.
Lastly- despite my username, this actually is not a bot account. lol.
Ok, I get that bots exist on Lemmy, but I don't think they have the capability to infiltrate a tiny community such as this just yet. Please keep an eye out and inform me immediately if you see suspicious activity. I appreciate the information regarding their capabilities.
Lastly- despite my username, this actually is not a bot account. lol.
We are following a democratic process here. We aren’t delegating the decision making to an oligarchy, even if it would simplify things.
Yes you are because the people swaying the vote will be users with dozens of accounts aka the Oligarchs.
Your example of a "democratic process" is one user having 50 votes and another user having 1. If one user is 50 times more powerful than the other that isn't democracy is it? That is apartheid.
To prove it I would literally have to do it myself.
I understand it can be done, what i'm saying is that it's hard to be done without evidence. I don't want you to shot a man to see that he can be shot, i'm just saying that it's hard to find place where you can shot them without witnesses.
If your intentions are pure, there is no reason for you to do something like that. If you witness people manipulating votes, by all means, come forward. But what is the point of posing this hypothetical, and suggesting that you would manipulate the vote?
There's a fine line between legitimate concerns and divisive red herrings. Do you honestly believe that our votes are being manipulated by bots right now?
I'm not giving any solution, only participating in this debate about a potential (or not) problem.
Only saying that your point is, as far as my understanding, to say that "Hypothetical" problems does not need any actions.
My point is that hypothetical things may happen. We need to evaluate the chance for it to happen, against the damages it can do.
Currently, I have these 2 things in the balance:
- Interest that any organization/company/attacker may have in manipulating/disturbing our community
- vs. Having a part of the community being manipulated - or (in the best case IMO) the community to be removed entirely
The choice does not seems obvious for me, I can find reasons to manipulate this instance or what appears to be on this instance. Manipulating it may have impacts on others instances of all the federations (even if at lower levels).
My current opinion is that, there is a problem that CAN happen, and so I don't want to do nothing about it, and let it probably happen. And if it happen, cry.
You seems to think that it may never happen (contrary to me), what does make you think that ? That is the question to answer to make me change my mind ! (And I'm ready for it, I'm not here to force my opinion, I'm here to read others and improve my opinion)
You seems to think that it may never happen (contrary to me), what does you make think that ?
On the contrary, I'm fully aware that it can and will inevitably happen. However it's not possible right now because the server is so small that I can check every account.
There are other, more pressing issues which must be addressed, and this line of argument would lead to the Agora becoming gridlocked.
The first thing I did was acknowledge that it was a valid concern. But we need to prioritize other things, and it's not yet necessary to revamp the voting system, just a couple of days after it was created.
Thank you you for participating in the debate and let me know if you have any other concerns.