Coca-Cola’s new AI-generated Christmas ad is as bad as you’d expect
Coca-Cola’s new AI-generated Christmas ad is as bad as you’d expect
You're viewing a single thread.
I mean it's basic and boring but, considering the production cost was probably (a lot?) less than $1,000, compared to the $5,000+ it would've cost if filmed/animated traditionally, that seems like a win. And the average viewer isn't even gonna notice. In fact, they're getting plenty of free publicity for using AI to make it thanks to articles like these
11 10 ReplyIn fact, they’re getting plenty of free publicity for using AI to make it thanks to articles like these
good thing there’s no such thing as bad publicity, otherwise this shit would be fucking embarrassing
19 0 Replymy my, those boots sure must be tasty
8 1 ReplyI've been boycotting cocacola for years now. Not sure what you're on about
9 7 Replyyou do not, under any circumstances, have to "give it to them"
there is no requirement to carry water for this awful shit
do not surprisedpikachu when someone calls out your weird posts
11 0 ReplyAre you quoting someone else?
Y'all get so upset about genAI and it's weird
2 10 Replyjesus fucking christ do you even understand where you're posting? how are you this goddamn oblivious?
9 0 Replyhow are you this fucking mid?
7 0 Replythe "you do not have to give it to them" is referencing a Dril tweet about Al-Qaeda, the person is implying you have a bad take, just FYI
6 0 ReplyI figured it was just an expression, thanks for the info! I'm aware of their opinion lol
1 8 Reply
I would guess the original commercial was in the vicinity of 10 million? And the new one would be like...$10k? Maybe more.
2 3 ReplyI doubt that.
5 0 ReplyI don't.
1 3 Reply
I think your prices are off by about 1000x, but your main argument holds up.
23 4 ReplyMy brain is stuck on 90s prices (I ran an advertisement company as a toddler)
11 6 Reply