You're viewing part of a thread.
You provide two links to random unrelated pages after having previously lied, claiming that sources had already been provided, entirely so that you could then repeat the lie and have something to point to, even though again, the links were irrelevant. Troll.
No one lied crybaby.
They aren't unrelated you're just retarded or arguing in bad faith. I'm know my guess as to which.
You literally did lie. You claimed I had been "provided sources" at a time when not a single source had been provided anywhere. That's called lying.
I'm pretty sure someone else did, it's irrelevant because I provided links and you didn't bother to do any research you just discarded them by look alone. So again dumb or not arguing in good faith so you can drop the indignation as it's fairly stale.
No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.
Here's a link that proves every claim you made this whole conversation is wrong. It literally says on this page that, in this specific comment chain, nobody had provide a link to a source at the time you claimed they had. The link is: https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/
See, I can provide irrelevant links and lie about what they say just like you do.
No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.
Who cares?! You have them now and you're not bothering to use them because you don't care you'd rather just object to object.