You're viewing a single thread.
After a certain point the Pokemon started being made with the level of creativity and identity you can expect from AI generated garbage, so I don't blame you for forgetting them.
Honestly I don't even think gen 1 Pokémon are anymore creative than the others. I was still a kid when the concept was new so they felt fresh, but pretty much every Pokémon I can think of is based on an existing archetype of some sort. Plant/Animal, inanimate object brought to life, spirits, dinosaurs, etc. Then you sprinkle on some regional flavor and there you go, you got a Pokémon.
"Identity" isn't something that belongs to the object, it's something that is assigned to the object by an observer.
The grass Joto starter was literally named after looking in the spice cabinet.
Magnemite is named after a magnet and Voltorb is an electric orb.
Tauros and Porygon are just one letter away from Taurus and polygon.
Ekans is snake backwards.
I'm open to having my mind changed, but I'm going to need more lol
This is why, in retrospective, I've really fallen out of love with Pokémon. I could have spent that time learning about real-world animals and plants, since it's so arguable, whether Pokémon are even cooler to begin with.
I still love Pokémon, I just try not to let my nostalgia for the old games get in the way of enjoying the new ones. I try to judge everything on its own merit.
But yeah I agree, really animals are way more complex and interesting than anything you'd find in a game.
If you can't see it, you can't see it. I can't point it out to you.
Very true!
I'm pretty sure the only ones that have truly stuck with me are the first gen.
I don't remember exactly, but didn't design change hands pretty early on? The first 151 were designed by a fairly famous character designer, iirc