None. This person doesn't know what they are talking about and they try to discredit the project based on their personal views and demonize the dev team.
Again, you demonstrate that you don't have the sufficient knowledge. There is no commerical device with open-source firmware. "Security Requirements" are not some kind of marketing bullshit as you seem to think. Graphene's can be found here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices
I doubt you understand what any of them mean, since you seemingly think Windows 11 requirements are just random things that are just there to hurt you.
You thinking that Stock Google devices are more secure than GOS simply shows that you fundamentally lack the understanding of how things work. They are built on the same core but Graphene has massively reduced attack surface and fewer ways to exploit remotely. And then we didn't even talk about the hardened kernel and such.
I wouldn't try to discredit projects I don't know anything about if I were you.
It does not "ship" them. They are available at your option. Other solutions to solve the google problem such as MicroG have/had several security issues. My favourite was when they leaked user passwords.
By this logic rpiOS sucks because its only supported on Raspberry PIs. Only Pixel hardware meets the security requirements of Graphene.
Not the only one but its factually the best one. Questionable to me is your expertise on this topic when you deter people from using the best option, based on your unrelated, subjective, non-technical views.
You can read their own privacy policy, in which they admit to everything: https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/en-ww
Ignore their bullshit marketing as for "why" they collect it and when they try to justify it. Look at the facts laid out.
Can you read their source-code? Nope. And they falsely advertise their phones as Privacy alternatives when they collect just as much data as Google.
Firstly, they did not push anything on you. And this is the internet and a discussion focused site at that. You should either accept that people can reply to you without you granting them the right to do so, or reconsider participating within public discourse, for your own wellbeing.
Skill issue. Get real friends who don't do this shit.
No reason to use this insead of Undiscord. Edit: Clear up missunderstanding.
Imagine caring about this shit.
Additionally, relockable bootloader ≠ full verified boot, but i doubt you even know what that means.
Would you be comfortable with using an unencrypted device? If yes then then you have a brain issue.
your personal experience from 20 years ago is irrelevant. its not possible today. tell me a phone where it is.
Without relockable bootloader you might as well disable encryption, as its possible for any attacker even for a thief to unlock your "secure" device by flashing any cracker zip.
What's the point of federation?
What's the point of federation, when we will end up having large clumps of users in specific communites under instances, where the owners of the instance can censor information, and enforce their political ideological false authory over everyone. If somebody doesn't agree they can be banned without any valid reason. Federation is censorship resistant only to large government entities. We fail to realise that the issue with censorship is the owners and admins.
And yes, we can meke new instances that support our beliefs and that doesnt censor our speech, but then again we dont have an evenly distributed userbase. Having duplicate communities is cojnter intuitive anyways because it will confuse users. Lemmy is a failed project in my eyes unless they find a way to resolve these issues somehow.
Bad example but if i start a torrent, then the people who seed will own just as much of the torrent as i do. I'll be equal with the peers without any upper hand. It cant be taken down or censored. Thats the idea i had.