Seems weird to me, the router would need to do deep packet inspection of DNS and selectively block specific ones. It feels more like you've set up your DNS to do forwarding instead of resolution. Can you post a network diagram and the DNS config?
It's a gas where the chemical reaction of the combustion has produced enough energy to heat it up to a temperature where it emits visible light. Kind of like a glowing piece of metal, but in gas form.
It's a mixture of black body radiation and individual spectral lines.
The spectral lines happen when electrons fall from a high to a low energy state and the energy difference is emitted as light.
Black body radiation describes the fact that everything constantly emits electromagnetic radiation (=light). But what kind of light depends on the temperature with colder bodies like us humans emitting infrared whereas warmer bodies like the sun emit visible light. That is also why light temperature is a thing and the unit is Kelvin.
Here are some graphs and stuff: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/648273/does-fire-emit-black-body-radiation
Do tcpdump host $server instead. Otherwise you will only see the request (the response goes to a different port).
Just to be sure you do dig A @server $domain (with the "A") and can confirm the following
SERVER is your server
;; ANSWER SECTION is empty (or doesn't exist)
;; AUTHORITY SECTION mentions your local DNS server
Also check
dig NS @server $domain
Is your server in the answer section?
Mine doesn't seem to exist anymore sorry.
Here is how I would diagnose (I'm assuming you have Linux / WSL on a client)
- Check the DNS record is actually set (yes do it again)
- Do these steps on the client:
dig $domaincheck which server answereddig a $domainshould give a recorddig a $domain @serverto make sure you're querying the right server
If none work, probably network issue (DNS boind to wrong IP, firewall, etc)
If 3 and 5 work but 4 doesn't, your DNS isn't authorative.
If only 5 works DNS settings on the client is wrong.
Luckily no government in Europe would ever try to force users to install spyware in their messengers europe wide.
If you assume everything is compromised, there is no safety. You have to trust something at some point.
Usually, speaking from a professional IT perspective, people trust encryption. Once you do that, it does not matter how safe or unsafe the place where you store your data is.
AES, the encryption standard used by pretty much everything, is safe. It has not been weakened in any meaningful way since its inception and is also quantum - safe.
You could use for example openssl or Veracrypt or even just 7zip to encrypt it. If you don't trust these tools, encrypt it twice with two different ones, just put a txt file next to it with the exact steps to decrypt, because you will forget in which order you have done things.
Personally I have a homeserver that is encrypted at rest and then it uses restic to store encrypted backups in the cloud.
Ultrasonic cleaner! Really awesome for glasses, jewelry, all kinds of small stuff. I fill it with isopropanol solution and clean my phone case in it.
Die Einkünfte die er hat sind laut deinem Zitat aber nicht aus Einnahmen der Firma, sondern durch den Verkauf von Aktien.
Es ändert sich nichts an der Tatsache, dass wenn man einen Dienst langfristig betreiben will, die Einnahmen mindestens die Ausgaben decken müssen. Das ist ja wohl offensichtlich erst jetzt der Fall.
Ja?
Offensichtlich wären sie ja nicht profitabel wenn sie es anders machen würden. Dann würden die Leute wieder zu See fahren und die Künstler würden gar nichts kriegen.
Its very unlikely for these reasons:
- limited lifetime
- we have already seen volcanic eruptions which put a lot of SO2 into the stratosphere, and thet did not cause an ice age, so it's clearly fine if we don't put too much
Anyway, that's what research is for.
Thank you, I deleted my post so as to not share false info.
A thing I want to point out about publicly traded companies is that they are legally required to maximize shareholder profit.
So if a CEO refuses to do something immoral that would increase profits, the shareholders can sue to have them fired and replaced with someone else.
Not protecting any company here but this entire system is fucked and clearly leads to enshittyfication and immoral actions becoming the norm.
They should re-use that old apple ad "there is an app for that!"
"There is a boxer for that!"
We should put research into stratospheric aerosol injection. We need an insurance to limit climate change if emissions don't go down fast enough.
We know it works, and it's at least not catastrophically unsafe as we have already done it with container ships, and seen it happen at bigger scale with volcanic eruptions.
This is a good start:
https://european-alternatives.eu/
Mostly moving to hetzner. It's a bit rough around the edges but works.
One big thing missing is there is no good and affordable WAF. Myra is good but costs at least 10k/month.
I am almost done migrating away from all US businesses as a result of this. I am even drinking freeway cola 😅
I work in IT as a freelance DevOps/Cloud engineer and am advising all my clients to migrate away from AWS etc.
Even sold most of S&P 500 and reinvested into an all-world ex-US ETF.