@133arc585
Wishing to write more but limited at 500 chars... we are happy to get on board your constructive feedback. We are enthusiast of what we are doing but it takes time and a lot of work to improve. Feel free to contact us at [email protected] to expand the conversation. Regards

@133arc585
A brief feedback summary 🙂
100% secure code is ideal but never the case: bugs, vulnerabilities, patches exist always. Hence, option one (100% secure) cannot be really considered in a real-world scenario.
Option two (not 100% secure) is not a binary choice: open-source is great but has wider implications other than peer/security review. Rights, alteration, distribution (etc) are to be considered too. We started with mixed open & closed source code, aiming to improve. Read next

@133arc585

Thanks, I will share your feedback internally and get back to you with a more details 👍

@Rush @smegforbrains

Hi, the client-code is naturally open, while currently the core-engine is kept highly encrypted and we do not publish it (yet) as open-source.
There are different views with pros & cons about opening it, regarding confidential comms.
Anyway we are independently pen-tested by volunteers. Thanks

@133arc585

The client-code is naturally open, while currently the core-engine is kept highly encrypted and we do not publish it (yet) as open-source.
There's a bit of a debate about pros & cons of opening it, regarding confidential comms.
Anyway we are independently pen-tested by volunteers.
Thanks for asking 👍

@133arc585

A rival sounds more like fighting against, but we rather designed a complementary solution that secure your data and metadata also while is use.
With Confidential Computing the messages are not traditionally stored/deleted, but they operate in a memory enclave so they cannot be retrieved with forensic technology... of course this comes with a capacity limit, focusing on (few) highly confidential comms.

We'll take the feedback about the hashtags in consideration. Thanks

@133arc585
Yes, walking the first steps here in Mastodon :-)

We are volunteers operating under an NGO based in Ireland... not rival of Signal, WhatsApp (or similar), but instead a complement for higher privacy

Sorry for the several hashtags, it's just the habit when posting

@smegforbrains
Unfortunately most #people #trust blindly the #Signal 's marketers and do not read the full #privacy #policy and #terms