Username checks out ;)
You'd think the bad publicity alone would be enough to destroy any chance of election. You'd think.
It does on the surface, but the problem is it quickly devolves into extreme utilitarianism. There are some other issues such as:
- How rich is rich enough for EA? Who decides?
- How much suffering is it acceptable to cause while getting rich to deliver EA?
- Is it better to deal with the problems we have now and in the immediate future, or avoid problems in millions of years that we may or may not accurately be able to predict?
- Can you even apply morality and ethics to people that do not exist?
- Who decides what has the most value?
- It's a cult.
And yet not as dumbfuck as your comment.
The joke that keeps giving.
Are you fucking five?
But no vaping ban?
The cynic in me says this is to test the water to see how pliable we are. What else will follow if we accept this, I wonder?
Is it even secret?
Exactly. We need to wipe them out at the next election.
It'll probably be against the law soon at the rate we're going.
Someone needs to tell her sex and gender are not the same thing. And then arrest her.
Yeah it's hard not to think this isn't by design. Pretty much every government has taken this approach too, I think it was Blair that started PFIs for example. Could be wrong.
Haha all good :D
I know, I was just curious how many steps it would take before they were honest about their own bigotry.
Of course they don't have the balls to be, so instead stay vague and deflect.
So no examples to back up your claim. Ok.
Do you have an example?
Spend that oil money trying not to look like backwards cunts while you still can, I suppose.