I'd say both, personally. On the app Sync (for a different platform), I was able to swipe away the current context to return to the previous one, going one layer at a time back to the homepage.

So I'd say ideally (and this is likely too much work to adjust), clicking a post should layer it over the current context. Clicking a close button or swiping with touch or cursor removes that contextual overlay. Ctrl/cmd click still opens a new tab instead, as does middle click. This could be a configuration setting that needs enabled, but applies at mobile sizes. Keep all normal href data (some services implement that in a way that prevents middle click/etc. from opening the new context in a new tab/window).

Maybe too "appy" for a website, but it was quite a nice interface for a native Android app.

Thanks for hosting this instance, BTW

Not the same person, but I'll say that I used Linux for a while before switching back to Win10. There were some features missing on Linux that were significant for QOL/efficiency with my job in web dev. The most significant was OneDrive support IIRC, but this was a few years ago now.

I'm open to considering other storage services, I mainly use OneDrive because it's free and convenient for my scenario. So 2 questions if I may:

1. Do you recommend a backup service that integrates well with a Linux distro's file manager service?

2. Are there any security services you would recommend for use on Linux? Defender is convenient on Windows, but I'm not sure what the reccomended Linux ones are.

Particularly with some bugs I've been dealing with lately, I'm tempted to jump back to ther other side.

If posted to a public forum like this one, non-commercial usage is obviously required. On the biggest (i.e., for-profit) social platforms, commercial use is also required (if I'm understanding those terms correctly, at least).

There is stuff publicly available online that has restrictions on commercial use. Because I'd rather see how open source AI generation goes, I'd prefer to have non-commercial efforts get that sweet data without giving it to the major tech companies.

Yeah, that's generally how I understand it. Capitalism works fairly well when everyone is on an even playing field, but then some people find ways to exploit human psychology to hoard wealth beyond the value they contribute. When money (capital) is considered a proxy for personal value/status, having large amounts of money grants power over others and the ability to bully your way to the top if you're cruel enough.

So we need to implement regulation that keeps capitalism in check by ensuring access to opportunity. Wealth taxes to avoid unconscionable amounts of accumulation. Guarantees of access to affordable (non-debt burdened) higher education, affordable healthcare, and affordable housing. Basically, the moral underpinnings of socialist ideology can be used to give capitalism a conscience by keeping the end game at bay. But that requires us to continuously battle against the greedy, power-hungry monied interests who will fight those regulations (and have defeated them, on many occasions).

If too much power is held by too few people, it becomes more risky to defy them, but it's a problem of allowing capitalism to run unfettered towards its natural conclusion of sucking all the wealth up into the hands of the most rutheless, heartless, and lucky (their beneficiaries).

Aggressively breaking up monopolies would help. I'd also argue for legal limits on how much the CEO/highest paid staff can earn relative to their lowest paid. Also, economic programs that favor lifting new people up rather than supporting the existing success aristocracy.

🙌

👋

Having looked around Lemmy a fair bit and understanding the platform structure a bit, I understand small well-run instance = gold, but new users without that onboarding would easily be turned away by small user counts.

Maybe it's a problem of recent internet culture, but it seems like users have a hard time taking the effort to understand a new interface. Whatever the reason, simplicity that pushes users to understand where they are could be quite helpful.

I could defnitely see that. I get the sense he has a particular penchant for deep dives and sharing knowledge which would make such a channel appealing (from a creator's perspective). He definitely deserves a break. After the last few years, we all do TBH

This sounds like an unfortunate consequence of the evolutionary pressure that has been allowed to take place within humanity for the past ~150 years. Profit is more important than anything else. So of course you'll have sociopathic "profit-above-all-else" mindsets among influential business figures.

I think you mean the "most profitable in the next 3 months on average" decision. It certainly isn't the best decision by any other metric.

Definitely. The best mods stay out of the way unless there's something harmful to the community. I've found it's best to have clear, practical rules and to enforce them at face value with as much leniency as practical. "Remember the human" applies as much to moderators as it does to users.

Mods like that probably exist. There are also many quiet mods, particularly in smaller communities, who try to govern even handedly. I never engaged in any protests or pushed any agendas until the recent API changes, and am trying to set up an alternate space to help ensure a space exists for the content/community.

Quite honestly, I don't like moderating or leadership and sort of fell into the role. Now that I'm here though, there's a sense of duty/obligation that makes it hard to leave.

I'd like to see a search engine that has a setting to just search forums. Organic user generated content is where most of the valuable information is, at least for troubleshooting/ product recommendations/ hobbies.