get out of here with your logic
So we decrease it from 13% of global to 10%? Not much of a dent in view of the 87% from fossil fuel use 🤷🏽♂️ but let's not mention that
"Globally, the largest share of humanity's CO2 emissions stems from burning fossil fuels, which made up about 87% of CO2 emissions over the past 20 years. Land-use emissions are responsible for the remaining 13%." https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-how-land-use-drives-co2-emissions-around-the-world/
true, I wasn't trying to diminish the original writing or production. I was only noting that the whole picture wasn't being presented fairly, since it's a huge difference between Barbie and Inception 🤣
I mean, can we really say barbie or Oppenheimer are some new IP that we can judge that way? 🙄
each is an at least partially established thing already.
it's not like a new idea was created and succeeded, just a new version of something that already exists
reduce, reuse, recycle... what's lost is that this is not alternatives, but an order
first try to reduce usage then try to reuse what you do use then try to recycle when possible