Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RE
regolith @lemmy.whynotdrs.org
Posts 7
Comments 87
Help me understand
  • Since they are debt-free they can use the billions to buy US Treasuries or similar and use the interest as revenue for profitability or a dividend, for as long as they want. If the share price continues to go up and they issue more shares then they can further increase their interest revenue from treasuries.

  • Superstonk is still trying to silence heat lamp
  • I feel ya, but since SS is not a reliable source I no longer go there and I don't bring it up.

    Everyone should know the heat lamp theory, and no one should be acting like we're all delusional for believing that plan shares are vulnerable and/or not counted as DRS. There was a time when we all believed that we owned the shares that we 'held' through a broker. If that wasn't true then why should I believe that I own plan shares? BOOK is the way.

  • Take care of yourselves
  • Personally, I don't think it's a rug pull. Worth noting that virtually all of the price action and volume is happening before market open. And there were some weird price swings after hours today from 51 down to 26 and back again, repeatedly for a short period of time. Without any evidence to support or refute anything my assumption is that major players are trying to make deals with each other, and some are successful while others are not.

  • Now that some believe me, What if a publicized DRS count of >76M actually breaks the math? What if ALL of the "Cede" quarters are actually hiding a massive increase in DRS?
  • Let's say you have two accounts at ComputerShare with DRSed GME stock. One of the accounts is in pure Book form while the other is mostly Book but also has a few in Plan. If you had the opportunity to see your entry in the ledger, then you could confirm whether or not the ledger showed you as having exactly 1000, 500, or something in between. Anything less than 1000 would support the Heat Lamp Theory.

    Another thing worth doing is just summing all the non-DTC/Cede entries in the ledger to the extent possible in the time allowed, to confirm that they add up to whatever the DRS total is for that day. I would expect that would only be possible if the ledger does not list all of the shares in Plan accounts under their respective household investor names.

  • Now that some believe me, What if a publicized DRS count of >76M actually breaks the math? What if ALL of the "Cede" quarters are actually hiding a massive increase in DRS?
  • There was some hypothesizing a while back (on SS and before Lemmy) that the initial drop or flatlining of the DRS trendline was due to hedgies having initially DRSed and then un-DRSed them, but I don't recall if that was ever generally agreed. This was about the time that the Heat Lamp Theory was introduced which seems to have more supporting evidence at this point.

  • 50 Years of Gaming History, by Revenue Stream (1970-2020)
  • Their mostly mindless games that people use to occupy their time such as puzzle games, candy crush, fashion dress up games, etc. Easy to start playing and easy to put down, so a lot of people have them. I think most people might pay $10 for a few games each per year, while only a small percentage of people are paying a lot of money into one specific game.

  • The PP Show sub banned on Reddit
  • In a nutshell, it was all the conversations that should have happened on Superstonk, but which were banned there (on SS). One of the tags that people could use for posts was 'black tar tinfoil'

  • Baffling thing about DRS numbers
  • I agree that the entries on the ledger would not be cumulatively more than the amount of issued shares, but I was under the impression that it would be possible to get an accurate tally of the DRS count from the ledger, which is what we seem to be lacking.

  • Baffling thing about DRS numbers
  • So, a while back Gamestop stated that they would pull their shares from the DTC/Cede if they determined that it was mishandling the company stock (or words to that effect). They may have changed the wording regarding DRS numbers if the DRS+Cede numbers don't line up and Gamestop doesn't want (or isn't ready) to take that action.

    To get the actual numbers, wouldn't tallying the entries on the register at the next meeting be the most straightforward path?

  • very short documentary of the guy that paints banks on fire

    alexanderschaefer.blogspot.com Chase your Dreams

    I don't post to my blog enough, but when something this good comes along I have too. Fantastic short documentary by Ross Harris giving back...

    0

    PSA: cash back rewards balance :NFA

    I posted this last week but to the wrong community and it got nerfed so here it is again.

    If you have a credit card then it's worth checking the account to see if there is a cash back rewards balance that can be applied towards your plans for generational wealth. Not financial advice.

    Enjoy the rest of your weekend :)

    0

    well, well, well, ... imagine my surprise

    www.reuters.com Credit Suisse inquiry will keep files secret for 50 years

    A parliamentary investigation into the collapse of Credit Suisse will keep its files closed for 50 years, according to a parliamentary committee document, a level of secrecy that has triggered concern among Swiss historians.

    Credit Suisse inquiry will keep files secret for 50 years

    A parliamentary investigation into the collapse of Credit Suisse will keep its files closed for 50 years, according to a parliamentary committee document, a level of secrecy that has triggered concern among Swiss historians.

    The document means the investigating commission would hand over its files to the Swiss Federal Archives after a longer gap than the usual 30 years to ensure high levels of confidentiality apply to the investigation, which has generated huge public interest.

    5