You still need the same amount of gold atoms at the input.
Most of them probably get 0 visits or close to it.
Sounds like he's just repeating a common meme. I don't see anything about higher level design that would make it more difficult for an AI (hypothetical future AI, not the stuff that's available now) compared to lower level tasks.
It's not nitpicking, stuff like this is far more impactful than choosing between 5 lines vs 10 lines long methods, or whether the hasExtraCommissions "if" belongs inside or outside of calculateExtraCommissions. This kind of thing should immediately jump out at you as a red flag when you're reading code, it's not something to handwave away as a detail.
Why is it a void method? This only tells me that some state is mutated somewhere, but the effect is neither visible nor documented.
I would expect a function called "calculate" to just return a number and not have any side effects.
Anything legally.
And AI scrapers and bots.
I wonder if all the political shilling is in hopes of future AI learning from it and being biased in the intended way.
You can run the model locally in ollama https://ollama.com/library/mistral-nemo
Thing is, even if Steam charged them 0%, they would be struggling all the same. They're struggling because they don't have enough sales.
If you don't figure out something's wrong after a couple pages, it's kinda your own fault.
This seems more like something they would integrate into Google Slides as a feature, rather than a separate product.
More likely it's the thing that generates all that heat in the first place.
Usually when you don't have internet access, it's because you don't have any signal at all.
Experiment how? What on earth could this possibly be useful for?
I can't believe I have to explain this. Anyway
The comparison to Alex Jones and other conspiracy nutjobs was about how they don't care about any facts or context, and just like to string together random headlines into some doomsday narrative that supports their view.
The phrase "tankie infowars" means basically that - same methods, just different target audience. So you would switch around who the good guys and bad guys are, but not much else.
You don't think coming to the conclusion "omg, this must be nuclear war preparations", instead of this just being a regular target, is conspiracy level thinking?
It would fit right into Alex Jones's show. And it's the most upvoted comment here.
Is this a tinfoil conspiracy site? Tankie infowars?
And judging by the recent Claude Sonnet 3.5 results, OpenAI may not even be the top AI company anymore.
The ironic thing is that if it weren't for free software, the entire AI industry would likely be a decade behind where it is today, if not more.