I am a professor of computer science at Southeast Missouri State university. I have been coding ever since I wrote my first line of BASIC back in the 1980s. I like reading, retrocomputing, modern computing, artificial intlligence, programming, electronics, and math.
C++
Yesterday, I decided to code in Tcl. That program is still running, i will go back to the day 5 post once it finishes :)
Today was super simple. My first attempt worked in both cases, where the hardest part was really switching my ints to long longs. Part 1 worked on first compile and part 2 I had to compile twice after I realized the data type needs. Still, that change was made by search and replace.
I guess today was meant to be a real time race to get first answer? This is like day 1 stuff! Still, I have kids and a job so I did not get to stay up until the problem was posted.
I used C++ because I thought something intense may be coming on the part 2 problem, and I was burned yesterday. It looks like I spent another fast language on nothing! I think I'll keep zig in the hole for the next number cruncher.
Oh, and yes my TCL program is still running...
My solutions can be found here:
// File: day-6a.cpp
// Purpose: Solution to part of day 6 of advent of code in C++
// https://adventofcode.com/2023/day/6
// Author: Robert Lowe
// Date: 6 December 2023
#include
#include
#include
#include
std::vector parse_line()
{
std::string line;
std::size_t index;
int num;
std::vector result;
// set up the stream
std::getline(std::cin, line);
index = line.find(':');
std::istringstream is(line.substr(index+1));
while(is>>num) {
result.push_back(num);
}
return result;
}
int count_wins(int t, int d)
{
int count=0;
for(int i=1; i d) {
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::vector time;
std::vector dist;
int product=1;
// get the times and distances
time = parse_line();
dist = parse_line();
// count the total number of wins
for(auto titr=time.begin(), ditr=dist.begin(); titr!=time.end(); titr++, ditr++) {
product *= count_wins(*titr, *ditr);
}
std::cout << product << std::endl;
}
// File: day-6b.cpp
// Purpose: Solution to part 2 of day 6 of advent of code in C++
// https://adventofcode.com/2023/day/6
// Author: Robert Lowe
// Date: 6 December 2023
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
std::vector parse_line()
{
std::string line;
std::size_t index;
long long num;
std::vector result;
// set up the stream
std::getline(std::cin, line);
line.erase(std::remove_if(line.begin(), line.end(), isspace), line.end());
index = line.find(':');
std::istringstream is(line.substr(index+1));
while(is>>num) {
result.push_back(num);
}
return result;
}
long long count_wins(long long t, long long d)
{
long long count=0;
for(long long i=1; i d) {
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
int main()
{
std::vector time;
std::vector dist;
long long product=1;
// get the times and distances
time = parse_line();
dist = parse_line();
// count the total number of wins
for(auto titr=time.begin(), ditr=dist.begin(); titr!=time.end(); titr++, ditr++) {
product *= count_wins(*titr, *ditr);
}
std::cout << product << std::endl;
}
That's some elegant code! Then again, I suppose that's the beauty of nim.
PHP
Today was the easiest day so far IMHO. Today, I coded in PHP, a horrible language that produces even worse code. (Ok, full confession, I fed my family for about half a decade on PHP. I seemed to have gotten stuck with it, and so I earned a PhD to escape it.)
Anyway, the only trouble I had was I forgot about the explode function's capacity to return empty strings. Once I filtered those I had the correct answer on the first one, and then 10 minutes later I had the second part. I wrote my code true to raw php's awful idioms, though I didn't make it web based. I read from stdin.
My code is linked on github:
I wrote today's program in Python. (I am going to do a different language each day.) The only thing that gave me a little trouble was I was counting "\n" as a part label. Once I realized that I was able to get both problems done very quickly.
My code for the two parts is on github:-
Honestly, I had never heard of neovim until I read your post. I think I will take it for a spinas lua extensibility appeals to me quite a bit. Thank you for mentioning it!