Well, I'd prefer Canonical to fix their shit, instead of forcing immature products onto users. I'm not against snap per se, as there are valid reasons for sandboxing, especially for games (remember when Steam accidentally wiped some user's home folders back in 2015? Sandboxing would have prevented that).
However, in its current state, snap causes just too much friction. For example Firefox can't remember the last used directory for up/downloads, Steam snap will just create a new data directory (forgetting about the games already downloaded), there's no way to allow additional folders (like /net from autofs) in snap apps etc. It's just a myriad of issues which make working with the system unnecessarily complex and frustrating, and there seems to be little progress fixing those.
no human should be treated this way
Absolutely, and that's why an Israeli newspaper is reporting this, and the IDF's own military police is conducting an investigation and has already suspended the commander in charge.
Now I'm looking forward to a Palestine newspaper condemning the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks, and Palestine authorities investigating the issue and prosecute those responsible.
Na ja, wir haben jetzt a.) Symptome und b.) eine Einstichstelle, beides ärztlich bestätigt. Bei einer Blutanalyse kann man dagegen nur das finden, wonach man explizit sucht, und es gibt buchstäblich hunderte Substanzen, die prinzipiell geeignet sind, die beschriebenen Symptome auszulösen.
In den meisten Fällen ist die alleinige Laboranalytik nur begrenzt hilfreich. Schnell verfügbare Standardtests, die die häufigsten Medikamente oder Missbrauchssubstanzen identifizieren (häufig Drogenscreening genannt), sind nur qualitativ aber nicht quantitativ. Diese Tests können falsch-negative oder falsch-positive Ergebnisse liefern und nur eine beschränkte Anzahl von Substanzen nachweisen.
Der Spiegel-Artikel suggeriert eine Bedeutung der Blutanalyse, die diese in Wirklichkeit gar nicht bietet. Das ist unseriös und schlechter Journalismus, egal ob man die AfD jetzt mag oder nicht.
keep as much space in front of me to the next car, as there is behind me to the next car, at all times
this is the right way.
That's not a problem, in fact it even helps the flow. What I meant was when folks keep an excessive distance to the next car, like in the OP (that lady could advance like, 10 places or so, translated into car lengths that would be 50 meters).
There are people who literally turn off their engine and don't start it again until they can go for 100 meters or more. This wastes road space and encourages lane-hopping, which also makes the traffic jam worse.
I hate it so much when people do that with their cars. It just makes the traffic jam much longer than it needs to be, possibly even extending it over the previous exit. It's not rational, it's just plain stupid and annoying.
Warum Unsinn? Seine Aussage
Je stärker die AfD ist, desto sicherer regieren die Grünen mit, weil dann anders keine Mehrheiten mehr zustande kommen
ist völlig plausibel und korrekt, solange die Union nicht bereit ist, mit der AfD zusammenzuarbeiten (und das ist in der näheren Zukunft eher unwahrscheinlich).
Actually, we do have trucks and SUVs and pickups, too. Though they are usually a bit smaller than an F150 or RAM 3500, so we often use trailers if we need to transport larger items.
Folks living in the center of big cities (which I personally believe are a bit overrepresented in this sub) often live in flats where stuff like dishwashers and washing machines are already provided, so they don't need to transport that, or even don't need/have a car at all. For those, there are delivery services and light trucks that can be rented.
I still believe that the ML companies "argument" is just a giant smokescreen. Reason is simple: ML companies can, and probably always have, just scrape the website. Why build an integration for every API under the sun if you can just build a web crawler once and be done? There are even existing, free implementations available so that's an absolute no-brainer.
It's about killing independent clients, nothing else.
Blockchain/proof of work is indeed not necessary, but identities should not be bound to instances. That's the thing #nostr gets right and the #fediverse doesn't.
Not at all. Instead I feel excited, since it seems decentralization might finally happen. Never was a fan of the big, centralized content silos.
Now, we just need to find a way to decouple identity from instances, since those might come and go. But that's a thing for another day...
Is there a way to determine which instances are blocked on a given Lemmy instance?