Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OV
ovovo @lemmy.dbzer0.com
Posts 2
Comments 10

Pedido de convites

Alguma alma caridosa poderia me proporcionar um convite para o Amigos Share ou Brasil Tracker?

0
What if... BitTorrent clients partially ignored the private bit of a torrent?
  • Yes, with this solution, internally it could be seen a two separate torrents, but if it is an option easily accessible in the client settings, and it is handled transparently as a single torrent, much more people will do it, and the scene as whole would gain with the network effect.

  • What if... BitTorrent clients partially ignored the private bit of a torrent?
  • Your suggestion would purposely share the same exact private torrent infohash into public DHT/PEX,

    Yes, but not necessarily. It is trivial to recompute the infohash with the private bit disabled. This would split the network, but that is probably a good thing to preserve the anonymity of the private tracker users, as pointed out by another commenter.

  • What if... BitTorrent clients partially ignored the private bit of a torrent?
  • I thought that it was so it could maintain a lower profile, thus attract less unwanted attention, and maintain the health of the torrents with the minimum ratio rules.

    But I am not dismissing this issue, I think it is important.

  • What if... BitTorrent clients partially ignored the private bit of a torrent?
  • But if this is a concern, the swarm itself could be split into internal/external, and no PEX would be allowed to happen for peers that are received exclusively from the tracker. This way, peers who have the setting enable would act as bridge between the two swarms, and only their IP would be visible.