I have been doing home automation for almost 30 years. I started with x10, and still have a few x10 devices deployed in my house, so I think I'm in a position to know what I'm talking about here.

There are a few major advantages Zigbee and Zwave have over x10, namely:

• The Zs are fast. X10 takes a quarter to half a second at best to travel through the house and activate the device. If there is noise on your powerline, it takes longer. Sometimes messages are missed. This is old tech, and there isn't a lot of error correction or signal ack.
• Phase Bridge. X10 uses your house power line to send signals. You may or may not know this, but (at least in the US) your power is split into one or more electrical phases. The X10 signals are absolutely terrible at crossing from one phase to the other, and it isn't always obvious when you plug something in which phase that outlet is on. This leads to a lot of troubleshooting. Things like phase bridges exist to solve this, but they aren't terribly reliable.
• Wireless. The Zs don't need to be connected to your powerline to function. There are no powerline x10 devices that run on batteries for obvious reasons. This allows for a lot more versitility.
• No setting house/device codes. If you have ever actually used X10, you know each device has its own house and device code that needs to be selected (usually with a tiny screwdriver while crawling on the floor in the dark, but I digress). This is all handled digitally and is more or less plug and play with zigbee and zwave.
• Encryption. Any idiot with an extension cord and some free time can connect to a power jack on the outside of your home and turn whatever they want on and off with X10. There is no authentication whatsoever. Ironic, considering the company most known for X10 devices sold security equipment.

Now there do exist some wireless battery powered x10 devices (the MS16A motion sensor, for example or the DS10A door sensor). These are actually fairly solid devices, and I still use a good number of them in my home. (I have many DS16As that have been in daily use for more than 20 years)

It isn't all bad, and there is no reason to throw it all out if it works for you. However, if you are buying new gear to automate with, there isn't really a compelling reason to go back to X10. the modern solutions are cheaper, faster, more secure, and easier to work with.

Kate is fine if you are already running KDE. If you are using a different wm, you need to install half of KDE to use it.

So block it? It only posts on my own personal instance. Two clicks and you will never see a post from it again.

You leaving a comment to complain about it took much more effort for much less effect.

Not op, but I have been doing this for years with a userscript. Getting rid of SEO garbage, pintrest, quora, etc links makes more room for the helpful results.

It is also a good way to ensure you don't land on any recipe sites that are built more for wasting your time than helping you cook.

I just got into the habit of permabanning any site that had anti-user patterns, annoying popups, right click/back button blocking, or clickbait headlines. I don't see a lot of that stuff anymore. Makes the net a bit more useful. Or at least less frustrating.

Just wanted to add that an update went out in the play store that allows a one time fee to just remove ads and tracking. I would prefer no google play services, but I am willing to compromise. I just paid $20 for my phone, and another $20 for my wife's.

Thanks for adding the option, @ljdawson!

Same. More than happy to support development, but I don't need another automatic subscription. I did OTP in the old app several times (purchased for different accounts, and again just because I use dns ad blockers, but still wanted to support the app). I am happy to do the same here, but not as a subscription.

Lj, please offer an option for OTP that removes ads while still being expensive enough to cover your costs.

It doesn't need to include push notifications or image preloading, or any other features that require you to maintain or rent infrastructure. I would be willing to pay $20 or $30 for a one time purchase option that doesn't make me feel like I am a drain to you when I block ads and tracking.

I will never look at ads or consent to tracking or violating my privacy, and I am willing to pay a (non-recurring) fee to enable that. I am sure I am not alone here.

Yeah, I used huge and very large on the old app, and that isn't changing here. I tried header/very large, but it was a bit too much. Nice to be able to read comfortably without squinting at the screen.

I could probably even settle for just being able to take the logo out of it. Last thing I want in my personal data device is to have a corporate logo of an ad company staring me in the face all the time.

(..)that’s not a studio anymore, that’s just a bank, a crappy bank that charges insane interest.

You make a good point there. I hadn't considered it from that perspective.

Whatever the solution, the ratio between executive pay and the pay of the people actually getting their hands dirty should be a lot closer to 1. Right now it is tragically far from that.

I agree they have some serious issues and inequality to work out, but I also concede that the sorts of productions we are talking about (science fiction in particular) tend to be expensive to produce. Having a large entity with deep pockets (like a studio) to foot the bill until money rolls in makes this easier.

We really need to get the powers that be to stop pretending that me consuming media streaming on my phone is somehow different than you consuming the same media OTA on television, or Alice watching on a laserdisc, or Bob on his home IMAX theater. The studios are either making content or they are not. They are either distributing that content, or they are not. And they are either paying the people who generate that content a fair, livable wage....or they are not. It really doesn't have to be any more complicated than that, and anyone who claims it is likely has a profit incentive in the current system to do so.

I'll miss new trek, but it is more important that the people who make it are able to secure a living. Hopefully the studios will get their heads out of their asses soon.

If you are fairly tech savvy, this isn't hard to do.

I have built a few sprinkler valves using an esp8266, relay, solenoid, and esphome. Total cost of each one is less than $15 (US). If you are willing and patient, you could probably get that to under $10 via aliexpress.

The circuit is really simple -

Parts list:

• 12v power supply
• DC to DC converter
• Microcontroller (esp8266 or esp32)
• 5v relay
• 12v solenoid valve
• Plastic enclosure (use old Tupperware or 3d print something)

Outline:

• Run power supply to dc-dc converter, and set converter to output 5v.

• Connect one leg of 12v through switch on relay, then to the solenoid.

• Connect other 12v leg directly to solenoid.

• Run 5v from output of buck converter to input of esp and relay.

• Run data wire from esp pin to data input in relay.

• Put everything but the solenoid in a plastic box.

• Run water source to solenoid inlet and connect sprinkler or drip system to solenoid outlet.

• Flash esp with esphome

• In the esphome code, you will need the home assistant api, a switch, and a sprinkler component.

• In home assistant, set a switch or button on your front end to test everything with and provide manual control

• Write a basic home assistant automation to control via timer, or weather conditions, or soil hydration, or whatever.

You can do all of this without any soldering or any (real) programming - that being said, those two skills will improve the results by quite a bit, and are just useful in general for this sort of work.

It can (of course) get as complex and full featured as you like, but if all you want is a system that can water your flowers every time the ISS passes overhead, the above will get you there pretty cheaply.