Again?

Its fine for a scientific paper, expected even, but this is meant to be an article for the non-experts.

The trick here seems to be then joining those paths for a collection of subgraphs?

ooh I do love me some graph theory so I am going to look more into this thanks!

the group has generated routes called Hamiltonian cycles

i only know this term which is simply a cycle going through all nodes, so Im going to assume there is a much easier way to explain what they achieved but the journalists are trying to be obtuse in order to sound smart.

The fact that a 17 year old game is still going after that kind of neglect is a true testament to how good it is.

Will this law ban goods made in the US via forced labor as well?

our anti-crime precautions
their high-tech surveillance

If he relly believes democracy is at stake there is only one course of action left

I postulate that there comes a point where language is required to achieve a higher state of emotion.

Ah finally! A justification to eat my own child! Thank you kind stranger!

Look at all those people in that thread going "I dont know if animals have the same emotions or just similar ones" or "we can't prove that plants dont feel pain too!" and then splitting hairs in the most asinine pseudophilisophical debates, just so they dont have to engage with the core of the issue, that what they're doing is fucked up.

They know it, deep down, as did I before I went vegan, but it's eye-opening to see it "from the other side".

Try something material. Something that has an effect in your material context.

attack on identity

Another debate term. I'm not arguing with you. I don't care about the truth value of that statement since it's irrelevant to the point that I wanted to make. Please stop seeing every conversation through the lense of which fallacy can be applied. Not everything is a debate.

You'll see it's a much more freeing and fun way to interact with people, I promise.

On second thought youre probably really young in which case I want to apologise. You're right that I neither argued for the claim in the link nor against your claim, I don't care about either of them since their irrelevant to the main point. Word of advice though, these kind of "fallacy debates" about irrelevant details are not productive I have never witnessed someone being swayed by it. Find something you actually care about then argue about that. Argue why you care for it, people are much more convinced by emotion than some stylized formal argument.

Just looked through your other comments, you're a debate pervert. You don't actually care about the topic at hand, you just want to debate.

the latter lol it's just been bog-standard racism the past century. There's quite the movement to create inclusive childrens books though, to normalize different family structures and cultures right from the start, but animal books for vegans are still quite sparse.

edit: there's one book where spousal abuse is played for laughs a couple times though, by a very popular author too, extremely weird shit

is that supposed to make it better or are you being a pedant?

Let me burn this horses skin so it is marked for the rest of its life

dont you dare put your cat on a vegan diet!

I believe it ties into the "if it cant be done 100% perfectly its not worth doing at all" excuse omnis have

thank you genuinely, now I need to find them in german as well🤣😭

😂

oh mine is learning animal noises still, cat goes "ma" sheep go "ba" dogs go "wa" elephants go "pffffff" lol.

But simply finding good picture books is already a pain.

Oh man how do we even define emotion, like what does it mean for something to be in pain, where do we even draw the line dude at sentience or at pain, what a quandary this all is

is what I got from your post. And its easily answered by "plants dont feel pain".