Honestly, it is such an obvious lie, too. Can companies really just lie in their filings to the FTC?

If she really believes those breasts, ovaries, and wombs are so important, why was she telling women to think about things? You don't think with breasts, ovaries, or wombs.

And what will she do when she hits menopause? How will that affect her beliefs?

The article was published January 23, 2013, so that was almost 12 years ago.

There's actually quite a lot that's blatantly out in the open right now. Here's Trump virtually saying outright that he trades government positions for political support.

“At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement … I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” Trump said in remarks at the Economic Club of New York. “We need to do it. Can’t go on the way we are now.”

That's just what the public knows. There's surely a lot more sinister quid pro quo behind the scenes.

So if the teacher had simply said, "yes," but in her head, she wasn't giving him permission, just stating that she believed he possessed the capability of entering, would he be able to enter or not?

You have forgotten about the currency that Trump usually deals in, something called "quid pro quo."

Boy it really makes those pictures of bees covered in pollen seem slightly less cute.

Sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mondays.

They do travel in flocks.

This is the real answer.

CBS not fact checking gives the liar a strong advantage.

The moderators not fact checking is fine for things like debate competitions because the judges are experts.

But in a public debate, an opponent even responding to a lie legitimizes the lie. "Of course he'd say that."

When a candidate lies and the facts are readily available to the moderators, it is imperative for the public good that they fact check.

Also, don't forget that Israel spends a lot of money to influence US elections. Until we have genuine campaign finance reform that disallows this, we'll have to deal with politicians who treat Israel better than it otherwise needs to be treated.

Trump, a main draw for Truth Social users and many retail investors in the company, said earlier in September that he will not sell his stake. The stock price briefly shot up after his remarks.

Other early investors have made no such promises. They include ARC Global, a sponsor of the blank-check firm that took Trump Media public, and United Atlantic Ventures, an entity controlled by two former contestants on Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice.”

I believe it's not only that these investors made no promises not to sell, but that several of them specifically expressed that they would be selling as soon as they were legally allowed to do so.

It's hard to accurately value Truth Social. But I think if Trump were to leave the platform, its value would go to zero, and that makes it very risky. I just saw a price of 12.74. I wouldn't be surprised if it's still quite overvalued, and so it makes sense for those investors to try to sell at this price.

The "lie" that is one of the foundations that all modern medical science is based on?

I agree with you. Imagine being that guy and thinking that scientists are pretending to do research and lying to the public for zero benefit.

One idea is to look at what kinds of weeds want to grow there, and plant desirable plants that look similar to the weeds.

The problem is that if these people are voting for Jill Stein, then they are not actually voting for who they wish. Jill Stein is not the person who they think she is.

If she were to magically win the election, they'd by-and-large be extraordinarily disappointed in the result.

This is why misinformation and disinformation is so destructive in a democracy. The voters need to be properly informed.

It's actually a lot more difficult and expensive to send something to the sun than to send it to Mars.

He should use the money he has now to build a rocket and send himself to Mars. That way he won't have to worry about US government programs anymore.

It's just such an obvious and outrageous lie. If you believe that, you'll believe anything.

Also, if it was happening, wouldn't the parents be the ones complaining? I mean, wouldn't the parents be famous right now? They'd be on all the talk shows making the news circuit.

If this actually happened, the parents' names would be famous. Trump would be parading these people around.

I also think he meant "defuse."

Isn't that the point in the interview, after Jason Miller says that the Harris campaign did something 100x worse, when you tell Miller that since he knows something that much worse, he should give an actual example?