Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LI
lililiIlil6457 @lemmy.world
Posts 1
Comments 0
Why aren't B theory believers called out for being the zombies that they are?
  • There's already evidence that some people don't experience time. The only thing to do now is determine who.

    For example Bernardo Kastrup keeps saying he's not conscious of anything existing or anything happening, only conscious of the NOTHING . He even wrote an article for Scientific American saying he doesn't experience a flow of time.

    Bernardo Kastrup: "There is no difference between everything and nothing. NONE WHATSOEVER. IT'S A COMPLETE DELUSION. NOTHING'S GOING ON." https://youtu.be/kkHC7t6QVhc?t=6071

    Bernardo Kastrup part 2: "And I think it's true. That's the magic of existence. Nothing ever happens. Nothing ever happened. Nothing will ever happen." https://youtu.be/BG31Oz0VWmI?t=2893

    Bernardo Kastrup part 3: Do We Actually Experience the Flow of Time? https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/do-we-actually-experience-the-flow-of-time/

  • Why aren't B theory believers called out for being the zombies that they are?
  • There are two options: The self having an experience at 12pm flows to the next moments, or the self does not flow to new experiences in the next moments.

    The B theorists deny that anyone flows to a new experience, SO the self must simply experience 12pm eternally. But eternally may sound wrong because it can be interpreted as everlasting. Timeless might sound better, like how people say that if numbers existed, the numbers could be called either "timeless" or "eternal."

    I concluded that the self must be eternally in that experience at 12pm, because there is no other conclusion.

  • some humans report a consciousness which all experiences are modifications of, like waves of the ocean, ripples of a pond. there are multiple kinds of humans.
  • SURE. if they experience suffering, their suffering is a modification of awareness. Presumably awareness is not bad in itself, and if you modify something that is not bad, then you don't get something bad. This is an odd conclusion .

    But I guess it explains why loony sam harris says there is no problem https://www.reddit.com/r/samharris/comments/18cidr4/from_the_perspective_of_awareness_there_is_no/

    or why rupert spira says ultimately there is no suffering https://youtu.be/yQ9BFxKlHUA?t=365

    this world is a JOKE

  • stupidquestions @lemmy.world lililiIlil6457 @lemmy.world

    In physics, does frame-dependent mean not real?

    frames don't exist. frame-dependent things don't exist.

    0