Why else would democrats support genocide and cozy up to war criminals like george w bush and dick cheney?

Perhaps we were invaded long ago.

Democrats aren't the cure, they're just slower cancer.

Non-votes and votes for third parties are counted as votes for republicans? What kind of electoral magic is this and why can't democrats get the same effect?

Also me waiting for a party that doesn't serve the rich first and foremost.

The gig work boom.

Wow, I completely misread that post. Now I'm wondering if I replied to the wrong message or if my brain just completely crapped out.

Are you talking about hamas or israel?

No, that's on israel that actually does not care about the hostages and intentionally torpedoed all negotiations and even killed some of them themselves.

I know you're being reflexively downvoted by who hate everything AI, but this is the sort of thing AI should be most useful for, which is finding patterns within large problem spaces with many variables.

Too bad the most heinous terrorist organization in the world is still at large and biden is their little bitch.

Which is especially worrying considering the interest rate:

(source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TERMCBCCALLNS)

Sure 11% is excessive, but I can’t see it drop like a rock any time soon.

How about when the AI pyrite rush stops? That'll mean a hell of a lot of shovels no longer being sold. That combined with wall street expectations of never-ending growth will mean a dramatic drop when revenue is a fraction of what it was just a quarter or so ago. You've already pointed out that AI isn't turning out to be a great source of profit, so it's clearly not sustainable. All other avenues of business you mention pale in comparison to the business that AI hype brought in.

How about Canadian bread? The address on the advert is in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Google destroyed that capability for extensions, so you have to use another browser.

I don't think the US would appreciate reducing their presence anywhere in the world.

Was "Anglo-Jewish" the "Judeo-Christian" of back then?

In my opinion, this is not the dichotomy that is present because a democracy should have more than one option. If there is only a single sane party to vote for then you don't actually have a choice. Democracy is supposed to be about choice. Additionally, in my opinion, both parties support genocide and I think this because they both support israel and israel is carrying out a campaign of genocide, as determined by multiple experts on the matter. When the only parties that have a chance getting any power both support something as horrific as genocide, I feel this cannot be considered a democracy.

Democracy is when there is only a single viable party and that single viable party also loves supporting genocide and further enriching the rich.

You mean this Clinton?: https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

You grow the fuck up and understand that these politicians don't give a shit about you and will happily sacrifice your livelihood if they can use the threat of "other guy" as a cudgel to get you to vote for them because they refuse to run on things that will actually help people since that would run counter to the wishes of their corporate masters.

We're seeing this in action as democrats make excuse after excuse for fully supporting a genocide. You know, genocide, which is supposed to be an unthinkable crime against humanity. Should be easy to not support genocide, right? A real slam dunk to gain supporters by pledging to stop genocide, right? Well, turns out politicians don't care about people's lives.

Instead of criticizing politicians who act in this way and who actually set policy, you think it's more fruitful to attack people on here who are likely going to vote for democrats anyway?