I recently upgraded to bookworm from bullseye.
I recently upgraded to bookworm from bullseye.
I have /etc/exports:
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported /mnt/storage/medialibrary/tv/ 10.0.0.0/24(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,insecure) /mnt/storage/medialibrary/music/ 10.0.0.0/24(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,insecure) /mnt/storage/medialibrary/movies/ 10.0.0.0/24(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,insecure) /mnt/recordings/ 10.0.0.0/24(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,insecure)
As a client running on a Vero 4K+, OSMC, mt /etc/fstab:
#nfs mounts 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/tv/ /mnt/tv nfs auto,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=10,timeo=14,hard,intr,noatime 0 0 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/movies /mnt/movies nfs auto,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=10,timeo=14,hard,intr,noatime 0 0 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/music /mnt/music nfs auto,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=10,timeo=14,hard,intr,noatime 0 0 10.0.0.38:/mnt/recording/ /mnt/recordings nfs auto,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.device-timeout=10,timeo=14,hard,intr,noatime 0 0
from the client: 'sudo mount -a mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting 10.0.0.38:/mnt/recording/`
df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on devtmpfs 991M 0 991M 0% /dev tmpfs 995M 1.3M 993M 1% /run /dev/vero-nand/root 14G 2.1G 12G 16% / tmpfs 995M 0 995M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 199M 0 199M 0% /run/user/1000 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/tv 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/tv 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/movies 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/movies 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/music 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/music
If I change the /etc/exports to: '/mnt/recordings/ 10.0.0.29(rw,sync,no\_subtree\_check,insecure)` Explicitly label the IP 'df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on devtmpfs 991M 0 991M 0% /dev tmpfs 995M 9.2M 985M 1% /run /dev/vero-nand/root 14G 3.0G 11G 23% / tmpfs 995M 0 995M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 199M 0 199M 0% /run/user/1000 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/tv 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/tv 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/movies 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/movies 10.0.0.38:/mnt/storage/medialibrary/music 458G 290G 145G 67% /mnt/music 10.0.0.38:/mnt/recordings 133G 36G 91G 28% /mnt/recordings'
Has something changed in bookworm in regards to nfs mounts? Thanks
"To be honest, I don’t like all this complaining. It is kind of annoying."
TLDR
why post to YT at all
@Elegast So, you recommend what hi DIDN'T want, good
To be honest, when I went solar 8-9 years ago, "environmental benefit" did not enter the equation, it was all about the cost I was paying for electricity.
I just recently purchased an ecoflow river, using it as an ups, and the cost to me was minimal, got it at dealers cost, again "environmental benefit" , didn't factor in.
I agree with OP, seeing lots of pics on the front page, something does need to be done, if not, I foresee restrictions on the horizon
The question I have, why doesn't anybody make a consumer grade UPS with a built in lifepo4 battery. I see lots of videos about how you can DIY one, but I would hate to destroy a fine battery.