Was sagt uns das über das Benutzen von Google oder anderen Datenkraken?
the area might be a little bit larger than what is highlighted, sorry
Edit: wording
hm interesting
its quite cold as well where i live 😉
oh, that's interesting... perhaps there's another activity that could be responsible for this?
i am talking about those two sections highlighted in red on the sketch to the right
this is unrelated to shaving
the mentioned area is noticeably smoother compared to other hairless parts
Edit: wording
good idea! usually I don't give much thought to that region while cycling 😂
hehe yes, it's for scientific purposes
the cycling thing does seem likely, but I'm hoping that some other people can confirm this
Edit: wording, formatting
nice!
Do you have any idea how you acquired that? Do you, like me, also cycle a lot?
Edit: wording, formatting
Okay, here's another thought: I ride my bike a lot; could this cause those spots?
Interesting point of view, but given that I typically wear comfortable clothing and boxer shorts, I don't think that's the case.
no, the bottom of my balls, both have this small area
stupid smart TVs
Why are there such idiotic smart TVs that can't even turn off bluetooth?!
There are at least two such devices in my apartment block and my bluetooth audio transmitter always tries to connect to them instead of my headphones. I have already talked to the people owning those TVs and we tried to disable BT, but it just isn't possible. This is driving me insane!
I never said anything regarding the truth of the original posts claim; it's just irritating when people start asking questions without even reading what was initially written.
There are socialist laws that govern and assist the poor everywhere in the world, so I would attribute the claim that "fewer people living in poverty" to socialism rather than capitalism; aside from that, those figures entirely depend on how poverty is defined.
Oh sure, defending people who aren't even willing to read the text of the post while also attacking the one who complains about that circumstance is better, right?
Well, if you bothered to read the text on the image, you would have found your answer.
but WHY is it necessary??