Yeah you should check out what century that act was last used. Unsuccessfully. Like i said, it happens every election https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25800973
It happens every election, frontrunner candidates often meet with many foreign leaders. They dont have any authority to set any policy, and talking isnt illegal.
Hes not setting US policy and doesnt officially represent us.
Car companies seeing more profit to be made isnt really a compelling argument. Just because they dont want to stop doesnt mean they cant.
Theres a difference between having things already around that we still need that require fossil fuels, and continuing to create new things that will require them even further into the future. We can immediately stop producing new gas powered vehicles and building new fossil fuel power plants.
Guess that means we'll keep sending bombs being primarily used against civilians
How do you see it play out if we say, in the US, any wealth over the cap gets taxed away.
Its a built in feedback loop. Under capitalism, resources are distributed based on capital. But capital is a resource. So its naturally going to concentrate.
We need hard caps on wealth
The metrics for measuring the performance of the economy need to be changed
Yeah this was another case of the court trying to legislate, there was no basis in any law for this defense, the court made it up.
One of the most contentious elements is how the law would extend collective bargaining rights to “independent contractors” who are not employees, a provision Kelly said he is concerned by.
some anti-union critiques. Didnt want independent contractors to be allowed collective bargaining rights.
you're right, it's not a cult, and I dont have to support harmful positions just because a democrat holds them.
damn I cant believe Harris is already president, without an election or anything
Gross, this guy was anti-union too?
His country's fight against starving civilians*
Kelly is doing his best to be a weird shade of purple
And that makes him gross