I think the word you were looking for is moist
.
But 0x80
is how you'd normally express 128 as hex. So it's relevant. But deliberately confusing.
And hopefully you never will
It was IBM's binary to character transform. DB2 can still use it if you configure it to do so. Or was at least as of the version from 1998 that I had to replace.
Lemmy's own Poem for your Sprog.
I would have pegged EBCDIC for that, but ok
I sincerely hope that if they come up with a 128bit instruction set they call it "x80" to maintain backwards compatibility with previous set names and be deliberately confusing to everyone.
I dunno, wlxaa392a001f7d
has a nice ring to it
I punched all the holes, is this right?
OK, using wine. Now I'm drunk. What next
I'll show you how to brûlée an ass!
Shitty job or not, it pays my mortgage and has a pension. Ten more years..... Just ten more.....
Yup. Your body is hardcore. Too hardcore for itself, even.
This too. And if you must use an antipyretic, supplement with external insulation or heat.