RAM transfer rate is is not important when swapping as the bottleneck will be storage transfer rate when reading and writing to swap.
Which I doubt Apple can make as fast as DDR4 bandwidth.
Yes, the people making the crime shows make real money.
It's also not a deepfake but quite fake looking AI generated stuff. And childlike synthesized voiceovers.
I frankly find making a whole tv production with actors,directors etc far more disturbing.
True crime shows have existed with real (paid) actors in mainstream media for decades. Certainly made more money compared to 'content creators'.
And yet it was attacked. The reality is content creators have only contempt for the concept of fair use. Another example is copyright strikes on unfavorable reviews.
He has been running a repair shop for apple products for a decade. So he is more knowledgeable about them as well as more affected by their choices regarding repairability.
I don't think latency is relevant in an application like lemmy. If you can't get posts from the server it's not latency but the server being overloaded.
So it's not actually the sexual 'tastes' that have changed but society's willingness to speak about them?
If 43 dead are the proper response for a police officer how many more should be killed for a normal civilian?
How do you think they 've changed? It could very easily be society being more open to discussing sexual tastes compared to 60 years ago.
Even if that was their point it's not true. But nofap is no masturbation period. Not just against watching porn.
Οχι μόνο ο ατομικισμος, αλλά κ η άγνοια, η χειραγώγηση, η ανασφάλεια, η παραίτηση, η ανελευθερια, η ανισότητα, η καταπίεση, η εγκληματικοτητα, ο ναρκισσισμος ακόμα, δεν είναι όλα αυτά συνέπειες μιας πνευματικής και ηθικής κατάπτωσης;
Ναι, το θέμα είναι εάν πράγματι έχουν αυξηθεί όλα αυτά.
Δεν ξέρω αν ποτέ έφερνε χρήμα η ενασχόληση με τις ανθρωπιστικες επιστήμες. Το κοινωνικό κύρος συμφωνώ ότι υπήρξε κίνητρο.
Συμφωνώ πως ήταν περισσότερο το κύρος και ίσως η σιγουριά το δημοσίου για κάποιους.
Όπως κ με την ιατρική κάποτε. Οσοι τη σπούδαζαν, για το χρήμα ή το κύρος το έκαναν;
Και για τα δύο και δυστυχώς μεγάλο ποσοστό χωρίς καθόλου μέτρο.
Οκ οπότε συμφωνείς πως υπάρχει μια πνευματική και ηθική έκπτωση με τον δημοσιογράφο αλλά όχι στο ποια είναι αυτή.
Ως παράδειγμα στο σχόλιο σου βλέπω την ενίσχυση του ατομικισμού και του καπιταλιστικού/καταναλωτικού τρόπου ζωής. Ως αίτιο όμως θεωρείς την έλειψη χρημάτων στις ανθρωπιστικές επιστήμες. Μήπως λοιπόν και παλαιότερα τα κίνητρα ήταν για μεγάλο κομμάτι των ασχολούμενων με ανθρωπιστικές επιστήμες πάλι η χρηματική αποκατάσταση; Ή η, κατά τη γνώμη μου όχι πολύ καλύτερη, επιδίωξη ενός στάτους;
εξάπλωση του διανοητικού βούρκου, της πολιτικής ορθότητας
Δου αράδες πάνω:
Τον καιρό εκείνο ήταν αδιανόητο να ακούσεις κάποια μητέρα να σου λέει ότι ο γιος της πάει στο Αρσάκειο. Το άκουσα πριν από χρόνια, σε παιδικό πάρτι όπου συνόδευα την κόρη μου.
They put their name on it. I hope it was monetary worth it because the public should not cut them any slack.
I think some people must be young and have not witnessed the late 90s, early 00s, before Firefox.
You had way more new users whose only notion of the internet was the blue e icon. Macs were less popular and of course there were no smartphones.
Microsoft pulled all the bullshit. "Extending" the standards so standards compliant browsers would not work, serving broken pages on non IE browsers and convincing an enormous amount of moron webmasters to tell you to go "upgrade" to IE while your browser could perfectly render their site.
Yet Firefox did break that stranglehold.
But you need to connect with people. Don't try to do it via relatively abstract concepts such as privacy or freedom. Tell them that they won't be able to block any ads in a year or so if they keep using Chrome. That they won't be able to download whatever they want.. etc etc.
Yes it will affect you even if you use Firefox. If a lot of us still used Firefox, Google would not be able to do it as websites would not give up on a big chunk of their audience.
Votes are federated. They are tied to account names. Only your instance can tie them to your IP.
DMs are insecure in that admin instances can read them. Most instances tell you not to use them.
Scraping is more resource intensive than using an API to have data submitted to you. Since you are now offering a service you can set terms on what you can legally do with that data while scraping can lead to legal issues. PR issues as well.
In general using a corporate social media will allow companies to track you (or buy the tracking data from the social media company) far more thoroughly than scraping lemmy.
Ads. To be precise this on it's own provides a way for servers to be certain of the environment the pages run (browser, plugins, os). Protecting ads or other functions come from servers refusing unattested configurations or configurations they don't like (i.e. running adblock, running firefox, running linux).
Given new commercial entrants into the Fediverse such as WordPress, Tumblr and Threads, we suggest collaboration among these parties to help bring the trust and safety benefits currently enjoyed by centralized platforms to the wider Fediverse ecosystem
In such a system, the server on which a post originates would submit imagery to PhotoDNA for analysis
This same technique could also be applied to other hosted media analysis mechanisms (e.g. Google’s SafeSearch or Microsoft’s Analyze Image API40
While large social media providers utilize signals such as browser User-Agent, TLS fingerprint,8 IP and many other mechanisms to determine whether a previously suspended bad actor is attempting to re-create an account, Mastodon admins have little to work with apart from a user’s IP and e-mail address, both of which are easily fungible.
So basically people might have joined the fediverse in large due to privacy reasons but if fediverse is to be "ethical" it should share your images with big tech as well as track you better.
He also laments Tor and E2E messaging.
Unfortunately I don't think he is the guy to actually put himself in harm's way l.