lmao I literally clicked this thread to post this exact essay

How do you reconcile that with the fact the vast majority of the IMCWP stands close to or right on the KKE's position on the whole shitshow in Ukraine?

Are these all "new communists"? Seems to me that's more like the OG guard that safeguarded ML wherever they were throughout the liquidationist and opportunist shitshow that was the 90s to the 2000s.

I'm the first one to call out ultra-leftism but it seems to me there is a certain bias to right deviation in here.

I would wager it is because most comrades here are unfortunately not active organizationally, may that be in their local youth league or party. As much as this space is great, it smells a bit overly online. That's understandable tho

Disclaimer: I certainly do not want to give credit to the maoist gonzaloite sickoes of /r/communism.

That being said, positioning oneself as a communist against or for multipolarity within the context that we are in is just a nonsensical question if you understand imperialism in the marxist-leninist understanding: the monopoly stage of capitalism, marked by the merging of bank and industrial capital into financial capital. Shifting which financial capital pole is dominant, or whether there are multiple financial capital imperialist poles matters little for communists: the end result is inter-imperialist war.

Should I quote Lenin in Socialism and the War and Imperialism: the Latest Stage of Capitalism, on that? Do I need to remind comrades that Lenin saw Tsarist Russia as a nascent imperialist state with a mix of feudal colonial elements and modern imperialist elements all that tied to it being dominated by British and especially French capital? The excuses then that today's Russia, an advanced capitalist state with sizeable capital export and control in its immediate region (larger than under Tsarist Russia to be noted), is therefore not imperialist is lazy. We must remain consistent. We must remain scientific, but very importantly we must remain clear eyed: The fact that the current war is an inter-imperialist one does not mean that we must ignore that the primary aggressor is undeniably western imperialism and its war dog the NATO "alliance".

The question of the war in Ukraine from the perspective of european and north american communists regardless of the above mentioned questions is simple: total and compete commitment to revolutionary defeatism. Full opposition to NATO. Building the mass base to make that happen. Implent that in the labour unions. That requires not to be larpy fucks too. That requires saying: "being pro or anti russia is none of our business, let the russian comrades deal with that, we oppose nato and demand peace negotiations and the stop of arm shipments, we demand investing all those billions in our working class instead of tools to kill Ukrainians and Russians". It might be cliche to say but we demand peace and bread, and in the context of enormous ass inflation and rising costs of leaving, along with trailing wages, the masses have never been more receptive to that message in decades.

I'll give you a concrete example: KKE is openly stating (only within the sphere of the IMCWP and communist organizing) that the war is an inter-imperialist war. And yet they are the single BEST party right now across europe in opposing NATO arms shipments to Ukraine, and dedicate their vast majority of energy opposing the war from a revolutionary defeatist basis. Anyone who shits on them from the comfort of their computers that haven't personally engaged in blocking trainloads of armoured vehicles for Ukraine can only shut the fuck up.

Edit: as to whether multipolarity bringing socialist states into emergence bring revolution slower or faster: i'd say this is a completely nonsensical thesis that is tied to accelerationism. It has zero basis in concrete organizing, and I would dare say, is an example of disgustingly "wishful" opportunism indicative of a complete and total disconnection from the working class.

Edit 2: I see a lot of downvotes and zero counter arguments. The echo chamber some of you lot lived in presumably with zero on the ground organizing has messed with your scientific socialism and your connection to proletarian internationalism. Join a party, engage in real life struggle, learn what it means to struggle against the NATO war in Ukraine outside internet micro-niches.

They say that and then openly state that they cant fork off because they have 0 technical kow-how and fundamentally depend on the original comrades who built this whole shit lol.

Isn't that what the entire federation point is? We can keep this community and keep it insular.

To expect that lemmy as a whole can remotely be the same as lemmygrad is delusional and indicative of being way too online. If anything having lemmy as a whole being more moderate and broader based is a propagandistic tool (not that it even matters that much, online is fake, join a party).

Gramscian hegemonic analysis with regards to the superstructural "war" is silly as fuck and a huge waste of time. We will never have hegemony offline or online under capitalism, the smart response is to adapt, propagate our ideas where it makes sense, and act strategically.

Honestly for me online is mostly a venting space, I see literally zero value over debating libs in that area. Pushing a counter narrative has some use yes, but even then that impact is minimal, and conclusive to at best the worst recruits you can possibly imagine.

edit: it's also a dogshit habit when it comes to mass work where you have to interact with countless ideologically backwards elements in the organized working class. You will never find purity. Going full guns blazing on libs is a time and place and contextual situation and you need to learn how to not flip the fuck out over backwards and even reactionary ideas in those settings, because doing that will lead you to never be able to stamp them out amongst the masses.

we do a little counter-propaganda posting friends

Care engaging with the post instead of reflexively being repulsed by it? Maybe give the contents a read, you might learn something !

Some might find this post distasteful or fear even engaging with its content remotely in good faith because of the indoctrination and lies they've been force fed over the past several years on the topic, but gotta eat your greens: this is a fantastic and necessary post that will, hopefully, be read largely.

It's odd because some communities in lemmy.ml and in other instances that don't block lemmygrad can't be found from a lemmygrad account.

I just made a lemmy.world account to be able to browse as largely as possible, possibly engage in some agitational posting where we are outright filtered out, and keeping this one for mostly lemmygrad posting and eventually hexbear posting.

Edit: some posts I can't even see from my lemmy.world account, like this one: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/715543 in [email protected] despite the fact I can see content from lemmygrad when I subscribe to its communities....

Something is fucky or buggy ig, I saw someone hinting at low server capacity? IDK

Let's gooo!

Also pretty sure Bolivia is holding an international Lithium forum with Chile, Mexico, Argentina, and Venezuela in the coming days to discuss how to develop and utilize Lithium in a way that benefits the region as a whole and done in a sustainable way while also benefiting the people first and foremost.

Edit: source https://www.telesurtv.net/news/bolivia-sera-sede-primer-foro-latinoamericano-litio-20220411-0034.html

I don't want to be an ass, truly, but any foundational guide to ML should include marxist feminist texts, decolonization texts, and marxist influenced queer liberation texts.

ML is an evolving science and giving a reading guide that is fundamentally pre 1920 is not great. It's reminiscent of what trots do tbh.

Seeing Sakai, who is valuable, but memeified, but not Fanon? Really?

Atleast include Kollontai, also. Maybe also some Arruzza and Federici.

Disagree or agree with PSL, but their liberation school curriculum is on point.

IMO this list is filled with redundant texts and non necessary reads also. This is fully inadequate to beginners, and also runs the risk of beginners seeing necessary and crucial developments in ML thought as secondary. A lot needs to be scrapped.

I'd also recommend including Althusser and Gramsci.