Feel free to list the rights which gays, trans, and ethnic minorities have lost due to republican actions.

Be sure to only include the rights which other normal citizens have.

Because "social equity" is not equality.

The sooner you guys realize that the better off we'll all be.

Calling people "Nazi" while you vote to coerce speech and kill unborn babies... Denial isn't cute. Once again, all you got is name calling. The logic is severely lacking with this one.

No need to apologize, my friend. Here's some timestamped links of the giant numbers leading the way:

https://youtu.be/vS-w8By9G88?t=7286

https://youtu.be/vS-w8By9G88?t=7646

https://youtu.be/vS-w8By9G88?t=7655

https://youtu.be/vS-w8By9G88?t=7692

https://youtu.be/vS-w8By9G88?t=7752

This level is just full of them, all those are for the same level... The timestamps are right on the spot, so might be helpful to pause or the player will probably just run past them quickly.

Not sure what happens on kbin when linking multiple YT vids in a single post. Let's find out!

Don't let your lack of values coerce you into thinking that your lack of values is justified.

Blame the culture, not the skin color. Only then will you truly understand.

Look beyond superficial attributes and instead delve into the underlying cultural dynamics that contribute to individual's behavior.

I wouldn't get on a plane with Ben Shapiro because he'll destroy the left wing

Hilarious.

Hm, something got lost in the conversation there... Boltgun does not have sequels or prequels it's not a "franchise" (regarding "Boltgun" itself, of course 40k is a huge franchise). There is only the one Boltgun game...

I was referring to certain levels within the game. Not every level, but some, have giant signs painted on the walls that will have Roman numerals, like "I, II, or III". With an arrow pointing a certain direction which leads to a door or how to progress through the level.

I wish I never noticed them as they felt very immersion breaking. Why would somebody paint on the walls exactly where to go and in which order?

If someone proposes an argument and another person tries to counter the proposed argument with the goal being to critically analyze the topic and challenge a position, the conversation becomes a "debate". Regardless of if the setting is formal or not. If you'd prefer to not call the conversation a debate, that's fine, Libs are well known for trying to redefine words to fit their narrative and the definition of debate itself varies depending on which source you query...

Since this isn't a formal debate and you were clear that you didn't think it's a debate at all, why then would you imply that the conversation must have a winner or a loser? Seems contradictory. I certainly didn't tell you that I won because I pointed out something that was seemingly obvious to everyone, besides yourself.

You seem generally confused as you lack the capacity to analyze a simple conversation. If the only thoughts you are capable of explaining are calling people names because you disagree with their position, I doubt you should be anywhere near an entertainment medium and more focused on furthering your education. Maybe then you might be able to comprehend the joke and attack it's position and validity.

I truly hope you have a brighter future ahead of you. Best wishes.

Instead of seeking to lose a debate through name-calling, I encourage you to focus on constructive debate techniques that can foster a healthy discussion and lead to personal growth and learning.

However, I now suspect that you recognize your friends in the picture and you're trying to dissociate. Best of luck to you!

Instead of seeking to lose a debate through name-calling, I encourage you to focus on constructive techniques that can foster a healthy discussion and lead to personal growth and learning.

It's called satire... If you cannot comprehend the joke, I hope God has blessed you in some other important way. Have a great day!

Probably libs cosplaying to push the narrative.

I really disliked the level design of Boltgun. When you need giant signs on the walls (I, II, III) with giant arrows pointing the way... I kinda think that's an obvious failure or lack of trying, regarding fluidity of the level design... A great and common feature that is often used to counter this is the use of a mini-map, very common in retro shooters, but mysteriously missing from Boltgun... Otherwise, yea Boltgun was mostly solid.

Sure I get it, it's part time job requiring both low skill and low hours invested. But how can we consider our children's safety as such a low priority? Should we instead pay the crossing guard by how well they perform at keeping the kids out of harms way? Sounds like we should reevaluate our priorities.

Selaco isn't released yet so keep that #1 spot open (https://store.steampowered.com/app/1592280/Selaco/) 🤞

6 examples of a trans person also being a sex pest doesn’t mean that all of them are

I agree.

But there are plenty more than the 6 covered in this video... Not regarding assaults, but regarding general sexual behavior towards minors, see public nudity at pride parades, "drag shows for kids", kids themselves featured in drag shows, etc. Bizarro world, indeed...

certainly doesn’t mean that granting legal protection and freedom to transgender people causes women to get assaulted/harassed by them.

I don't believe anyone implied that. The video implied that allowing trans people into whichever bathroom they choose to enter was considered "safe" but this doesn't constitute "legal protection and freedoms".

Trans people, in the US, have just as many "legal protections and freedoms" as any other normal person. The aspect of this discussion where the matter at hand becomes controversial is that you might think men pretending to be women should be allowed into legally protected spaces that are specifically for women, whereas anyone with a moral compass would see that this ideology is fundamentally flawed.

I don't want you to think that I am not empathetic to the complexity of the situation. I think it is very important to consider our options moving forward... I've asked this question a few times in other discussions but I'm always willing to hear a fresh take on it.

Men and women are segregated for specific reasons regarding bathrooms and locker rooms. So when we have a group of people which can freely transverse these spaces, there is reasonable concern. What needs to happen to ensure that all persons are free and comfortable in their public spaces? Should we be erecting new public facilities that cater specifically to trans people? Do we need separate spaces for both trans men and trans women? Similarly, should we also make spaces for gay persons?

I read the news articles, from various sources. I trust you can not only find the same articles, but do your own due diligence. It's quite sad that this simple task is seemingly so difficult for you lot.

Try searching the words the man in the video is saying. Seems obvious. But, oh well. You can only lead a horse to water...

While consensus ideally involves everyone agreeing, in practice, achieving unanimous agreement can be challenging, especially in large groups or complex situations. In such cases, consensus is often understood as a broad agreement among a significant majority.

I don’t believe in your mythology and I don’t give a flying fuck about what you think about your god

Seems like you're deflecting. But, to address your concerns, I'll have you know that not only does nobody care, the general consensus of the world is also that some type of God or higher power does exist... So, I hope you have a better day, friend.

I can't possibly stand differing opinions. We must ignore all views which don't align with the echo chamber!

Ignorance is bliss, my friend.

Best of luck to you in your endeavors. I love high contrast visual themes and the "Read Aloud" text to speech add-on, helps me a heap!

If you try to impose YOUR morality on me I will fight to the death over it

Sorry, buddy. It's the world consensus. Not specifically my morality. Also, if you've been following the conversation, I was not the one to bring religion into account.

Morality can be approached from various perspectives, including secular or philosophical viewpoints. Secular ethics, for example, seeks to develop moral principles based on reason, empathy, and the well-being of individuals and communities. Philosophical systems such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics provide frameworks for moral decision-making without relying on religious beliefs.

However, I do hope that God has blessed you in some other important way. Have a great day, friend!