No wonder he reposted. He's one of those older models, programmed by a central computer. Not us, we're independent thinkers.

"Animals that people consume were killed as babies or toddlers, relative to their natural lifespan."

Well human life expectancy is 70 years, so:
Cow - 17.5
Sheep - 2.3
Pig - 2.3
Turkey - 1.2
Duck - 5.3
Chicken - 13.1

So that holds for most of the animals listed, but not cows or chickens.

Anyways, fact checking time. Quick googling^[Yeah, I don't have a robust source, but neither does the image.] says that the life expectancy of these animals is actually:

Cow - 20
Sheep - 12
Pig - 12
Turkey - 10
Duck - 12
Chicken - 7

So that would make the human-scaled ages be:
Cow - 17.5
Sheep - 3.9
Pig - 2.9
Turkey - 1.2
Duck - 4.4
Chicken - 15.0

Hope this helps anyone curious about the data.

That's right.

Dub is short for win.

I took Game Theory and the professor's first name was Patrick. Some ID for something related to the course (that he chose himself) was "patmath".

Sounds like a good feature request to make.

Fun fact, Lemmy supports that kind of citation without you having to format it manually^[If you want to see how, just click the "view source" button.]. It's pretty convenient if you ask me. I mean, maybe some apps won't see it correctly, but it should work.

No, snuffles005, that doesn't mean "yzax" is a valid word for Scrabble.

Your message could have been more efficient:

• "who say" already implies people, so you could have said "those who say" to be less redundant.
• "do so" is needlessly making a reference to exactly what you just said. Try "They say 'tuna fish' because".
• "someone else" is redundant because the only person that's not "else" is the person in question, and they wouldn't have heard it from themselves.
• "the kind of people to" is redundant because you already established that they're people. "the kind who" would be more efficient.
• "blindy follow others" doesn't need to say "others" because it's obvious that they'd be following someone other than themselves.
• "neither of those redundancies" is also a tad redundant, referring back to the established redundancies and then calling them redundancies again.

So a less redundant version of your message:

They say "tuna fish" because they heard someone say it, and are the kind who blindly follows rather than engage in critical inquiry and actively eliminate redundancy.

Intelligent people say neither redundancy.

Of course, I'm just poking fun. I don't expect anyone to eliminate all redundancy from their speaking; some of it has use, especially in verbal communication. For example, saying "datil pepper" even though datil also refers to the pepper is useful because someone may not recognize that a datil is a pepper upon hearing it (though you'd be hard pressed to find that scenario with tuna outside of ESL.)

In one of my last CS classes, we did proofs and would use "by observation" for this kind of thing.

Yes, the debuff is fatigue, which is also the debuff for not sleeping. So if you're a powergamer, you might as well just not sleep.

In Pathfinder, you need a feat to sleep in medium armor. As for heavy armor, you're out of luck... barring homebrew or mythic campaigns.

True story, I used to do this with a slider order I requested at the gas station every day. When they got it wrong, that was just adding some variety, which was good to me.

WEED EATER.

Yeah, that's what I mean. In the city, it's against the cultural grain and doesn't work. In a small town, it's normal.

One second has passed, ah ah ah.
Two seconds have passed, ah ah ah.

I'm talking verbal replies, not head nods. I don't remember any head nods.

I would say there's a pretty big correlation there because friendliness is the quality of being willing to engage in conversations with people (even brief ones) and potentially make friends. If you're not even willing to reply to a simple greeting, that's understandable, and someone who does that may still be friendly in other contexts, but they're not friendly to strangers on the street, and that's what I'm referring to. I'm not trying to throw shade or anything; it's an understandable learned response. It's just that city life is a different culture than suburban/rural life, and different sorts of people are going to prefer each.

I've walked down the streets of Philadelphia on a Sunday morning - much less crowded than public transportation - and said good morning to people I passed. Even then, only half of them even gave a greeting in turn. There may be more friends, clubs, and hobby groups available in cities, which is certainly a nice thing, but there's a loss in the friendliness of people on the street because there are so many of them. To each their own.

Da ba de da ba die

Never got the breakfast, or...?