Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SH
Shake747 @lemmy.dbzer0.com
Posts 1
Comments 200
Italy considers law against sharenting to protect children's privacy
  • There'd be hardly any parents left if you could jail bad parents on whim based on a singular observation.

    Then many of those kids would be even worse off...

    Thinking back to the very "concerned parents" of my childhood, they were usually the over protective lunatics

  • I'm told that this is a real picture.
  • Your solution to losing is to now bandwagon with "the lesser of two evils"? Why wouldn't you abandon that party entirely? There's more than two choices.

    They'll kill and take away the rights of people who aren't you though...yay...

    To top it off, you go on to bash those who think that's not a good choice

    The irony.

    But don't listen to me, I'm the stupid one.

  • J.K. Rowling will not be arrested for comments about transgender women, police say
  • It's also enabled everyone to see cultures and ways of life they would never be able to before. People can share their differences and traditions more openly too. Knowing more about cultures, practices and different people is what opens doors to not being racist

  • J.K. Rowling will not be arrested for comments about transgender women, police say
  • You're forgetting that we have technology that connects most of the world now, even across languages. This definitely changes things.

    But it sounds like you'd prefer to live under a government like the CCP. That way you don't have to worry anymore because they'll take care of everything for you

  • J.K. Rowling will not be arrested for comments about transgender women, police say
  • You're asking me to predict the future, maybe it doesn't happen. Maybe 1 lifetime? Maybe 2?

    Who knows, but all we can do in the meantime is continue to actually talk with people caught in the storm.

    If the government tries to force speech, what do you think that will do? Do you think everyone will say "oh ok", and just quietly live out their lives at home in resentment or in prison for this never to return?

    It's a bandaid to a problem where we're just supposed to trust that governments will always use this power correctly

  • J.K. Rowling will not be arrested for comments about transgender women, police say
  • Racism isn't an implicit call to violence. Violence is one of the ways it can manifest if it's deranged enough, but most racism is just sorta quiet and often unconscious.

    It's not a good idea for the government tell you what you're allowed to say - that change has to come naturally from the bottom up, not artificially from the top down

  • The slow death of Twitter is measured in disasters like the Baltimore bridge collapse
  • It's not so much what their interpretation is of the specific article is, it's more that you might find more information from someone who has info that was left out, or maybe another source that has conflicting information.

    Could you show us a few not so biased news sources? I suppose this will also vary wildly by topic. A news outlet might be narrative/propaganda driven on one topic, but not about another.

    It's so much mess (through corporate ties or money) to sort through, it's hard to trust any of them anymore

  • FedNow - how do you all feel about it?

    FedNow appears to be launching July 23, 2023. To me, it doesn't seem very good in the sense that the Fed now gets to be a middle man to payment transactions (sure it's "instant" but we're all aware that security != convenience).

    It's also a "centralized" solution.

    It could be a stepping stone to a centralized digital bank currency is my fear. And also the fed will now be able to see/monitor all transactions through it.

    1